Figures & data
Figure 1. Effect of OXL (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg, i.p.) on mice for permanence time on the swivel bar in seconds. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA ‘one way’ followed by Dunnet's test. ***p < .001 versus control group (vehicle).
![Figure 1. Effect of OXL (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg, i.p.) on mice for permanence time on the swivel bar in seconds. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA ‘one way’ followed by Dunnet's test. ***p < .001 versus control group (vehicle).](/cms/asset/c1b27507-3867-4abc-ab79-04d7cb3141c8/iphb_a_1228682_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Effect of OXL (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg; i.pon the number of writhes induced by acetic acid in mice. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA ‘one way’ followed by Dunnet's test. ***p < .001 versus control group (vehicle).
![Figure 2. Effect of OXL (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg; i.pon the number of writhes induced by acetic acid in mice. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA ‘one way’ followed by Dunnet's test. ***p < .001 versus control group (vehicle).](/cms/asset/e1a6d857-ca8c-48e2-9316-da89b3de018d/iphb_a_1228682_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Effect of OXL (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg, i.p.) on paw-licking time in the first (A), and second (B) phases of the formalin test in mice. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA ‘one way’ followed by Dunnet’s test. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p <.001 versus the control group (vehicle).
![Figure 3. Effect of OXL (50, 100 and 150 mg/kg, i.p.) on paw-licking time in the first (A), and second (B) phases of the formalin test in mice. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. ANOVA ‘one way’ followed by Dunnet’s test. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p <.001 versus the control group (vehicle).](/cms/asset/5086da79-8fc0-4c0e-be5a-494335541233/iphb_a_1228682_f0003_b.jpg)