Figures & data
Figure 1. The chromatograph chart at 354 nm (A) and the (−)-ESI total ion current (B) of Typha angustifolia.
![Figure 1. The chromatograph chart at 354 nm (A) and the (−)-ESI total ion current (B) of Typha angustifolia.](/cms/asset/05b84ca3-95e9-486e-ab22-ad76c5c7929d/iphb_a_1300818_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1. The identification of flavone compounds in Typha angustifolia.
Figure 2. The DPPH scavenging activity (A) and Fe3+ absorbance (B) of the extract of Typha angustifolia.
![Figure 2. The DPPH scavenging activity (A) and Fe3+ absorbance (B) of the extract of Typha angustifolia.](/cms/asset/ff224691-16f8-47b1-98e8-0adb30bbe54b/iphb_a_1300818_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect of typhaneoside and I3ON on HUVECs stimulated with LPS. (A) normal control. (B) HUVECs was treated with of LPS (100 μg/mL) stimulation for 24 h. (C) HUVECs induced by LPS was treated with typhaneoside (70 μmol/L). (D) HUVECs induced by LPS was treated with I3ON (70 μmol/L), magnification ×200. Data are expressed as the means ± SD. (standard deviation, n = 5). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. sham control; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. LPS group. Con: sham control group, LPS: LPS group.
![Figure 4. Effect of typhaneoside and I3ON on HUVECs stimulated with LPS. (A) normal control. (B) HUVECs was treated with of LPS (100 μg/mL) stimulation for 24 h. (C) HUVECs induced by LPS was treated with typhaneoside (70 μmol/L). (D) HUVECs induced by LPS was treated with I3ON (70 μmol/L), magnification ×200. Data are expressed as the means ± SD. (standard deviation, n = 5). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. sham control; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. LPS group. Con: sham control group, LPS: LPS group.](/cms/asset/e4388a8a-e1d5-4168-85d5-6b0f3b856cf5/iphb_a_1300818_f0004_b.jpg)