Figures & data
Table 1. IC50 values and tumour specificity rate for compounds.
Figure 2. DPPH• scavenging, ABTS•+ scavenging and reducing power activities of isolated compounds and positive controls. (The same letters on the columns of DPPH and ABTS revealed that the differences are not significant statistically (p > 0.05). The different letters indicated that the differences are significant (p < 0.05).
![Figure 2. DPPH• scavenging, ABTS•+ scavenging and reducing power activities of isolated compounds and positive controls. (The same letters on the columns of DPPH and ABTS revealed that the differences are not significant statistically (p > 0.05). The different letters indicated that the differences are significant (p < 0.05).](/cms/asset/18085b48-90c6-43ba-a039-420b5f8b2c1e/iphb_a_1310906_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. The antiproliferative activity of compounds on C6, HeLa, HT29 and Vero cell lines. Cell proliferation was measured using a BrdU Cell Elisa Assay Kit. Percent inhibition was reported as mean values ± SEM of three independent assays (p < 0.05). Each experiment was repeated three times for each cell line.
![Figure 3. The antiproliferative activity of compounds on C6, HeLa, HT29 and Vero cell lines. Cell proliferation was measured using a BrdU Cell Elisa Assay Kit. Percent inhibition was reported as mean values ± SEM of three independent assays (p < 0.05). Each experiment was repeated three times for each cell line.](/cms/asset/fa4cb5dc-ff91-4242-8d83-d032c3a64ba1/iphb_a_1310906_f0003_c.jpg)