Figures & data
Figure 1. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.) and morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on TNF-α-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represent the time-course curves ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) ††p < 0.01 and †p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
![Figure 1. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.) and morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on TNF-α-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represent the time-course curves ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) ††p < 0.01 and †p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).](/cms/asset/d3645e43-698d-477f-a1f1-b4f6cf3e4f58/iphb_a_1355927_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.) and morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on IL-1β-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represents the time-course curves **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) ††p < 0.01 and †p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
![Figure 2. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.) and morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on IL-1β-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represents the time-course curves **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) ††p < 0.01 and †p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).](/cms/asset/96f6ebde-1eb4-4532-bbc2-a6122eb807e2/iphb_a_1355927_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.) and morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on bradykinin-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represents the time-course curves ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) †††p < 0.001 and ††p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
![Figure 3. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.) and morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on bradykinin-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represents the time-course curves ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) †††p < 0.001 and ††p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).](/cms/asset/6da967d0-2e04-48ab-ab33-e2a6e4138dff/iphb_a_1355927_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.), morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) and diclofenac (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on PGE2-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represents the time-course curves **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) ††p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
![Figure 4. Effect of pretreatment of rats with EthE (30–300 mg/kg, p.o.), morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) and diclofenac (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on PGE2-induced hypernociception. Each datum represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. The symbols * and † indicate significance levels compared to respective control groups: (a) represents the time-course curves **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test), whereas (b) represents total anti-nociceptive effects (AUC) ††p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).](/cms/asset/9eec456d-efba-43bd-83bc-a51bb092c5d3/iphb_a_1355927_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Effect of pretreatment of mice with (a) yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), (b) nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), (c) atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), (d) naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.), (e) granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), (f) L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p.), (g) glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and (h) theophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the nociceptive scores of EthE (100 mg/kg, p.o.) on the time-course curves of formalin-induced nociceptive test. Each point represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 compared to the control group at same time points (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test).
![Figure 5. Effect of pretreatment of mice with (a) yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), (b) nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), (c) atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), (d) naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.), (e) granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), (f) L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p.), (g) glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and (h) theophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the nociceptive scores of EthE (100 mg/kg, p.o.) on the time-course curves of formalin-induced nociceptive test. Each point represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 compared to the control group at same time points (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test).](/cms/asset/165c501c-9320-42b2-a010-91b06cf35617/iphb_a_1355927_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. Effect of pretreatment of mice with yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p), glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and theophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the total nociceptive score of EthE (100 mg/kg, p.o.) in phase 1 and phase 2 of formalin-induced nociception. Each column represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared to control group and †††p < 0.001, ††p < 0.01 and †p < 0.05 compared to EthE-alone-treated group (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
![Figure 6. Effect of pretreatment of mice with yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p), glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and theophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the total nociceptive score of EthE (100 mg/kg, p.o.) in phase 1 and phase 2 of formalin-induced nociception. Each column represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared to control group and †††p < 0.001, ††p < 0.01 and †p < 0.05 compared to EthE-alone-treated group (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).](/cms/asset/09c1893e-aeb6-47aa-853d-3e1a01aaf298/iphb_a_1355927_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. Effect of pretreatment of mice with (a) yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), (b) nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), (c) atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), (d) naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.), (e) granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), (f) L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p.), (g) glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and (h) theophylline (10 mg/kg i.p.) on the total nociceptive score of morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on the time-course curves of formalin-induced nociceptive test. Each point represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 compared the control group at same time points (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test).
![Figure 7. Effect of pretreatment of mice with (a) yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), (b) nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), (c) atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), (d) naloxone (2 mg/kg, i.p.), (e) granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), (f) L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p.), (g) glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and (h) theophylline (10 mg/kg i.p.) on the total nociceptive score of morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) on the time-course curves of formalin-induced nociceptive test. Each point represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 compared the control group at same time points (two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test).](/cms/asset/b272b0db-32a1-4c09-ba79-2d2e7e11043b/iphb_a_1355927_f0007_b.jpg)
Figure 8. Effect of pretreatment of mice with yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p), glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and theophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the total nociceptive scores of morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) in phase 1 and phase 2 of formalin-induced nociception. Each column represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared to control group and †††p < 0.001, ††p < 0.01 and †p ≤ 0.05 compared to morphine-alone-treated group (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).
![Figure 8. Effect of pretreatment of mice with yohimbine (3 mg/kg, p.o.), nifedipine (10 mg/kg, p.o.), atropine (5 mg/kg, i.p.), naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), granisetron (2 mg/kg, p.o.), L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p), glibenclamide (8 mg/kg, p.o.) and theophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) on the total nociceptive scores of morphine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) in phase 1 and phase 2 of formalin-induced nociception. Each column represents the mean of five animals and the error bars indicate SEM. ***p < 0.001 compared to control group and †††p < 0.001, ††p < 0.01 and †p ≤ 0.05 compared to morphine-alone-treated group (one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc test).](/cms/asset/7758038b-bea0-4ab7-9b48-2a576c9424be/iphb_a_1355927_f0008_b.jpg)