Figures & data
Figure 1. Chemical structure of shikonin (Zhao et al. Citation2017).
![Figure 1. Chemical structure of shikonin (Zhao et al. Citation2017).](/cms/asset/be07914c-e75c-4ef5-af09-940a940e7b65/iphb_a_1506482_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1. Primers used in qRT-PCR.
Figure 2. Effect of SHI on hPDLC proliferation. hPDLCs were exposed to SHI (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL) for 1, 3 and 7 days. Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT assay. The data are expressed as the percentage of the control (containing medium only). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05 versus the control. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.
![Figure 2. Effect of SHI on hPDLC proliferation. hPDLCs were exposed to SHI (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL) for 1, 3 and 7 days. Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT assay. The data are expressed as the percentage of the control (containing medium only). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05 versus the control. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.](/cms/asset/51696aba-c557-4fb7-b729-ac4f9650c7eb/iphb_a_1506482_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Effect of SHI on hPDLC morphology. hPDLCs were pretreated with SHI (0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS for 12 h. Images were then captured using a Nikon Eclipse TS100 light microscope (A) and a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U fluorescence microscope (B).
![Figure 3. Effect of SHI on hPDLC morphology. hPDLCs were pretreated with SHI (0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS for 12 h. Images were then captured using a Nikon Eclipse TS100 light microscope (A) and a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U fluorescence microscope (B).](/cms/asset/750f39ac-391d-4758-aa85-a20117a5f18e/iphb_a_1506482_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect of SHI on hPDLC gene expression. hPDLCs were pretreated with SHI (0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS for 1 and 3 days, after which total RNA was collected. After RNA extraction, first strand cDNA was synthesized. The cDNA sample was then amplified using qRT-PCR. The expression of the target gene was first normalized to 18s and then further converted to the percentage of the control. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05 versus the control while *p < 0.05 versus the LPS group. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.
![Figure 4. Effect of SHI on hPDLC gene expression. hPDLCs were pretreated with SHI (0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS for 1 and 3 days, after which total RNA was collected. After RNA extraction, first strand cDNA was synthesized. The cDNA sample was then amplified using qRT-PCR. The expression of the target gene was first normalized to 18s and then further converted to the percentage of the control. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05 versus the control while *p < 0.05 versus the LPS group. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.](/cms/asset/df1608f3-962c-4168-8f05-662d70689bee/iphb_a_1506482_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. SHI-induced signaling pathways in hPDLCs. hPDLCs were pretreated with SHI (0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS for 30 and 60 min, after which, total protein was collected. The levels of protein expression were determined by western blotting. The expression of p-ERK was converted to the percentage of total ERK; expression of NF-κB and I-κB were converted to GAPDH. Then the data was further converted into the percentage of the control group. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05 versus the control while *p < 0.05 versus the LPS group. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.
![Figure 5. SHI-induced signaling pathways in hPDLCs. hPDLCs were pretreated with SHI (0.25 and 0.5 µg/mL) for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS for 30 and 60 min, after which, total protein was collected. The levels of protein expression were determined by western blotting. The expression of p-ERK was converted to the percentage of total ERK; expression of NF-κB and I-κB were converted to GAPDH. Then the data was further converted into the percentage of the control group. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3). #p < 0.05 versus the control while *p < 0.05 versus the LPS group. Statistical analysis was performed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.](/cms/asset/41909400-c1d7-4601-903a-b1f44f0d9200/iphb_a_1506482_f0005_b.jpg)