3,050
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

UPLC-PDA-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS fingerprint of purified flavonoid enriched fraction of Bryophyllum pinnatum; antioxidant properties, anticholinesterase activity and in silico studies

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 442-454 | Received 13 Apr 2020, Accepted 31 Mar 2021, Published online: 30 Apr 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Bryophyllum pinnatum plant.

Figure 1. Bryophyllum pinnatum plant.

Figure 2. Overlay of UPLC chromatogram at 280nm top and base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms (bottom) of BPFRF.

Figure 2. Overlay of UPLC chromatogram at 280 nm top and base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms (bottom) of BPFRF.

Figure 3. Photodiode array detector (PDA) spectra and mass spectra (MS/MS) fragmentation pattern present in B. pinnatum flavonoid-rich fraction (BPFRF). Luteolin C-glucoside-C-arabinoside (carlinoside) (A). Quercetin (B). Luteolin (C). Quercetin-3-methyl ether (isorhamnetin) (D). Luteolin-7-glucoside (E).

Figure 3. Photodiode array detector (PDA) spectra and mass spectra (MS/MS) fragmentation pattern present in B. pinnatum flavonoid-rich fraction (BPFRF). Luteolin C-glucoside-C-arabinoside (carlinoside) (A). Quercetin (B). Luteolin (C). Quercetin-3-methyl ether (isorhamnetin) (D). Luteolin-7-glucoside (E).

Table 1. Constituents of BPFRF identified and characterized by UPLC-PDA-Q/TOF-MS2 analysis.

Figure 4. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical scavenging effect of BPFRF in comparison with ascorbic acid (3.125–100μg/mL).

Figure 4. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radical scavenging effect of BPFRF in comparison with ascorbic acid (3.125–100 μg/mL).

Table 2. DPPH radical scavenging potential, lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity and cholinesterase inhibitory activity of BPFRF, quercetin and standards.

Figure 5. Fe2+-induced lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity of BPFRF and the ascorbic acid.

Figure 5. Fe2+-induced lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity of BPFRF and the ascorbic acid.

Figure 6. Cholinesterase inhibitory activity of BPFRF AChE (A). BuChE (B).

Figure 6. Cholinesterase inhibitory activity of BPFRF AChE (A). BuChE (B).

Table 3. Binding energies of BPFRF ligands and known inhibitors against AChE and BuChE drug targets.

Figure 7. Illustrations of molecular interactions (left: 3D and right: 2D) between the/highest binding energies of BPFRF constituents and standard against AChE target. Luteolin-7-glucoside (red) (Ai, Aii). Quercetin (orange) (Bi, Bii). Rivastigmine (purple) (Ci, Cii).

Figure 7. Illustrations of molecular interactions (left: 3D and right: 2D) between the/highest binding energies of BPFRF constituents and standard against AChE target. Luteolin-7-glucoside (red) (Ai, Aii). Quercetin (orange) (Bi, Bii). Rivastigmine (purple) (Ci, Cii).

Figure 8. Illustrations of molecular interactions (left: 3D and right: 2D) between the highest binding energies of BPFRF constituents and standard against BuChE target. Carlinoside (yellow) (Ai, Aii). Quercetin (grey) (Bi, Bii). Rivastigmine (purple) (Ci, Cii).

Figure 8. Illustrations of molecular interactions (left: 3D and right: 2D) between the highest binding energies of BPFRF constituents and standard against BuChE target. Carlinoside (yellow) (Ai, Aii). Quercetin (grey) (Bi, Bii). Rivastigmine (purple) (Ci, Cii).
Supplemental material

Supplementary_Data_PHB.doc

Download ()

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon request.