Figures & data
Figure 2. LC-MS/MS chromatograms oflaurolitsine and IS nuciferine in different matrix. (A) Blank biological matrix; (B) LLOQ sample of different biological matrix (laurolistine 1 ng/mL−1); (C) rat plasma of 1 h after i.v. administration laurolistine, rat urine of 0–4 h after p.o. administration laurolistine, rat liver tissue of 2 h after p.o. administration laurolistine; (D) rat plasma of 1 h after p.o. administration laurolitsine.
![Figure 2. LC-MS/MS chromatograms oflaurolitsine and IS nuciferine in different matrix. (A) Blank biological matrix; (B) LLOQ sample of different biological matrix (laurolistine 1 ng/mL−1); (C) rat plasma of 1 h after i.v. administration laurolistine, rat urine of 0–4 h after p.o. administration laurolistine, rat liver tissue of 2 h after p.o. administration laurolistine; (D) rat plasma of 1 h after p.o. administration laurolitsine.](/cms/asset/408bb4b1-9a5c-49f3-83ef-9eee892bf8a5/iphb_a_1944221_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1. Standard calibration curves and LLOQ of laurolitsine in different matrix.
Table 2. Intra-day and inter-day precision, accuracy of laurolitsine.
Table 3. Stability of laurolitsine in plasma, liver, kidney, urine, faeces (n = 6).
Table 4. Extraction recovery and matrix effect of laurolitsine (Mean ± SD, n = 6).
Figure 3. Plasma concentration-time curve of laurolitsine after i.g. (10 mg/kg) and i.v. (2 mg/kg) administration to SD rats (n = 5).
![Figure 3. Plasma concentration-time curve of laurolitsine after i.g. (10 mg/kg) and i.v. (2 mg/kg) administration to SD rats (n = 5).](/cms/asset/d4518372-593e-47a1-b76d-aa2d35bd913a/iphb_a_1944221_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 5. Pharmacokinetic parameters of laurolitsine after i.g. and i.v. admininstration.