766
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in ischemic heart disease

, , , , &
Pages 293-299 | Received 15 May 2016, Accepted 02 Jul 2016, Published online: 22 Sep 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Mesenchymal stromal cells – mechanisms of action. (Reprint from Singer NG and Caplan AL. Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011; 6:457–78. With permission from Annual Reviews).

Figure 1. Mesenchymal stromal cells – mechanisms of action. (Reprint from Singer NG and Caplan AL. Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011; 6:457–78. With permission from Annual Reviews).

Table 1. Mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Figure 2. Hospital admission rates per patient from 3 years before treatment to 3 years after treatment. NS: non-significant; PCI: percutane coronary intervention; UAP: unstable angina pectoris; AMI: acute myocardial infarction. (Reprinted from Mathiasen et al. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;170(2):246–51) with permission from Elsevier).

Figure 2. Hospital admission rates per patient from 3 years before treatment to 3 years after treatment. NS: non-significant; PCI: percutane coronary intervention; UAP: unstable angina pectoris; AMI: acute myocardial infarction. (Reprinted from Mathiasen et al. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;170(2):246–51) with permission from Elsevier).

Table 2. Mesenchymal stem cells in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease.

Figure 3. Differences in cardiac function from baseline to 6-month follow-up. (A) End-systolic volume, (B) end-diastolic volume, (C) ejection fraction, (D) stroke volume, (E) cardiac output, (F) myocardial mass, and (G) scar tissue (Paired t-test. Bar values are mean ±95% confidence intervals). (Reprinted from Mathiasen et al. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1744–53 with permission from Oxford University Press).

Figure 3. Differences in cardiac function from baseline to 6-month follow-up. (A) End-systolic volume, (B) end-diastolic volume, (C) ejection fraction, (D) stroke volume, (E) cardiac output, (F) myocardial mass, and (G) scar tissue (Paired t-test. Bar values are mean ±95% confidence intervals). (Reprinted from Mathiasen et al. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1744–53 with permission from Oxford University Press).

Figure 4. Dose–response effects: (A) end-systolic volume, (B) ejection fraction, and (C) mean myocardial mass. p Values represent the differences between subgroups of the mesenchymal stromal cell group (one-way ANOVA. Bar values are mean ±95% confidence intervals). (Reprinted from Mathiasen et al. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1744–53 with permission from Oxford University Press).

Figure 4. Dose–response effects: (A) end-systolic volume, (B) ejection fraction, and (C) mean myocardial mass. p Values represent the differences between subgroups of the mesenchymal stromal cell group (one-way ANOVA. Bar values are mean ±95% confidence intervals). (Reprinted from Mathiasen et al. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 14;36(27):1744–53 with permission from Oxford University Press).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.