Examining the mediating role of support resources in the self-efficacy and career satisfaction relationship among professional women in a developing economy

Figures & data

Table 1: Means, standard deviations, reliabilities and correlations among constructs

Note. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; α = Cronbach’s alpha coefficient; n = 606. Correlation values ≤ 0.29 are practically significant (small effect); ≥ 0.30 ≤ 0.49 are practically significant (medium effect); Correlation values ≥ 0.50 are practically significant (large effect); *p ≤ 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.

Figure 1. Pathway coefficients from the mediation model are significant at **p ≤ 0.01; *p ≤ 0.05

Table 2: Direct and indirect effects of self-efficacy (NGSE) on career satisfaction (CSS) through scale perceived organisational support (SPOS) and social support (MSPSS)

Note. n = 606; ***p ≤ 0.001; **p ≤ 0.01; *p ≤ 0.05;

STD (est) = standardised (estimate); SE = standard error; CR = critical ratio; BC = bias corrected; CI = confidence interval.

Data availability

Data generated for this study are available when need.