Adaptive management: are important environmental concepts understood and valued by the public?

Figures & data

Figure 1. Sample choice set for 8GL of additional environmental water (source: Cooper, Crase, and Burton 2023).

Figure 2. Explanation used for adaptive management attribute.

Table 1. Mixed logit estimates of discrete choice experiment data.²

	Model
	Coefficient	Z value
Cost	−0.057***	17.13
cost*wrong	0.012***	3.73
monitor	0.065	0.42
monitor*wrong	0.179	0.85
monitor*fac1	−0.008	0.06
monitor*fac2	−0.047	0.30
water^$	0.076***	6.79
water*wrong	−0.031***	3.82
water*fac1	0.006	1.07
water*fac2	0.001	0.23
water*difference	−0.009	1.42
asc^$	4.252***	10.86
asc*fac1	0.590***	3.11
asc*fac2	−0.440**	2.22
asc*wrong	−0.605***	1.78
asc*difference	−0.413**	2.13
SD
Water	0.047***	5.15
Asc	2.313***	12.95
N Log likelihood Pseudo R2	559 −1379.3 0.40

$ These variables modelled with normally distributed random parameters.

** Significant at the 5% level.

*** Significant at the 1% level.

Cooper, B., L. Crase, and M. Burton. 2023. “‘Households’ Willingness to pay for Water for the Environment in an Urban Setting.” Journal of Environmental Management 348: 119263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119263.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar