Interpath relations and the triggering of wine-tourism development

Figures & data

Table 1. Types of regional path-reformation as a result of emerging paths.

		Market	Assets
Type of path-reformation	Path-renewal	Different*	Related
	Path-expansion	Complementary	Related
	Negative path-development	Same	Same but scarce
	No reformation	Different	Different
		Same and abundant	Different

*Inferred from Breul et al. (2021).

Source: Authors based on Frangenheim et al. (2020) and Breul et al. (2021).Source: Authors.

Figure 1. The Margaret River region in Western Australia. Source: Authors.

Table 2. List of interviewees.

Type of interviewee	Interviewee code	Number of interviewees
Independent academic experts	1 to 4	4
Representatives of non-for-profit organisations	5 to 7	3
Representatives of destination marketing organisations	8 and 9	2
Representatives of the UNWTO Australia’s Southwest Tourism Observatory	10 and 11	2
Representative of an ecotourism certification organisation	12	1
Representatives of local industrial organisations	13 and 14	2
Representatives of community organisations	15 to 25	11
Federal authorities	26 to 28	3
WA authorities	29 to 36	8
Local authorities	37 and 38	2
Representatives of tourism-related businesses	40 to 54	16

Figure 2. Summary of the variegated interpath relations of tourism with timber, dairy, and tourism. Source: Authors.

Breul, M., Hulke, C., & Kalvelage, L. (2021). Path formation and reformation: Studying the variegated consequences of path creation for regional development. Economic Geography, 97(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1922277

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the single path view: Interpath dynamics in regional contexts. Economic Geography, 96(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar