“There’s Just Way More Places Operating in the Same Space”: Competition and Boundary Work in Australian and United States Political Journalism

ABSTRACT

The previous decade has seen rapid change in political journalism in Australia and the United States, with legacy and emerging news organisations under pressure from interconnected global and local economic, technological and political trends. At the same time, professional journalists’ traditional democratic role providing political news and analysis is challenged by competing sources of political information and new spaces for political discussion. This article traces the ways political journalists in Australia and the US talk about internal and external sources of competition in an age of “information abundance”. It explores how they reclaim authority in the face of the fluid boundaries of journalism itself. The article analyses in-depth interviews with political journalists in Australia and the US, conducted in the second half of 2017. Through the analytical lenses of “boundary work” and “paradigm repair”, it examines the identity discourses through which political journalists seek to place limits on who and what belongs within the professional community of journalists, and defend the core values and practices of that community even while adapting to and in some instances, incorporating elements of, the practices of competitors.

KEYWORDS:

• Journalism
• political journalism
• boundary work
• paradigm repair
• interviews
• Australian journalism
• US journalism
• journalistic authority

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the political reporters, editors and professionals in both Australia and the United States who so generously offered their time and insights.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

ORCID

Stephanie Brookes http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-6530

Additional information

Funding

The author would like to acknowledge the support of Monash University through their Outside Studies Program, through which this research would not have been possible.