Commencing on the Right Foot towards (On)Line of Dance –an Empirical Study in India

Figures & data

Figure 2. The location of participating Dance Schools in India

Table

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha	N of Items
0.964	40

Table

KMO measure of Sampling Adequacy
0.930**

**Significance at .0001

Descriptive statistics.

Gender	Frequency	Percentage
Males	60	28
Females	155	72
Total	215	100
Age	Frequency	Percentage
Less than 21 years	62	29
21 to 35 years	104	48.3
36 to 50 years	49	22.7
Total	215	100
Dancing Experience	Frequency	Percentage
Less than 6 months	47	21.8
6–24 months	51	23.8
More than 24 months	117	54.4
Total	215	100

Table

Pearson Coefficient of Correlation (N = 215)
PE-> BI	EE-> BI	SI-> BI	FC-> BI	OTSE – > BI	BI-> UB
.621**	.545**	.547**	.469**	.362**	.612**

** 2-tailed Significance at .0001

Figure 3. Conceptual Framework with Correlations

Table

t Test	BI		UB
	Female	Male	Female	Male
t – Calculated	0.844		0.48
t – Critical	1.97		1.97
Result	Not Significant		Not Significant

Table

	F	Sig.	Result
BI (3 levels)	.633	.532	Not Significant
UB (3 levels)	.519	.596	Not Significant

Table

Previous Dance Experience	F	Sig.	Result
BI (3 levels)	1.025	.360	Not Significant
UB (3 levels)	.108	.898	Not Significant