The Promotion of Sustainable Development Principles Through the Design Review Process. The Case of the Cambridgeshire Quality Panel

Figures & data

Figure 1. Eight core design governance problematics (source: adapted from Carmona, 2016, p. 714).

Figure 2. Housing completions and commitments in Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire, 2011–2031 (source: CCC 2018; SCDC 2018).

Figure 3. Map of Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire, showing location of new developments of strategic importance (source: SCDC 2018).

Figure 4. The Cambridgeshire Quality Charter’s “4 Cs” (as defined in Cambridgeshire Horizons, 2008, p. 4).

Figure 5. Checklist of criteria that applicants need to consider under the Cambridgeshire Quality Charter’s “4 Cs” (source: Cambridgeshire Horizons, 2008).

Figure 6. Planning application process and the CQP review stages (Source: Compiled by authors).

Figure 7. Examples of issues raised by the Quality Panel in relation to the Quality Charter’s “4 Cs” (source: compiled by authors during fieldwork).

Carmona, M. (2016). Design governance: Theorizing an urban design sub-field. Journal of Urban Design, 21 (6), 705–730730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1234337

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Cambridge City Council (CCC). (2018). Cambridge Local Plan October 2018. Cambridge City Council.

 Google Scholar

Cambridgeshire Horizons. (2008). Cambridgeshire quality charter for growth. Cambridgeshire Horizons.

 Google Scholar