Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 17, 2016 - Issue sup1: Issues in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
1,115
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Choosing which ear to implant in adult candidates with functional residual hearing

, &

Figures & data

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the eight scenarios that described hypothetical candidates with one ‘scoring’ ear and one ‘non-scoring’ ear. The duration of deafness of the non-scoring ear was varied across the scenarios and was described as either having been aided continuously or unaided. The shaded ear in each scenario represents the ‘unilateral’ choice; that is, the choice that was likely to maximize benefit from use of the implant alone based an actuarial model of outcomes in profoundly deaf UK candidates (CitationUKCISG 2004).

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the eight scenarios that described hypothetical candidates with one ‘scoring’ ear and one ‘non-scoring’ ear. The duration of deafness of the non-scoring ear was varied across the scenarios and was described as either having been aided continuously or unaided. The shaded ear in each scenario represents the ‘unilateral’ choice; that is, the choice that was likely to maximize benefit from use of the implant alone based an actuarial model of outcomes in profoundly deaf UK candidates (CitationUKCISG 2004).

Figure 2 The proportion of respondents who chose the ear that was likely to maximize benefit from the implant alone (‘unilateral’ choice) based an actuarial model of outcomes in profoundly deaf UK candidates (CitationUKCISG 2004). Proportions are shown separately for the four unaided scenarios (open symbols) and the four aided scenarios (shaded symbols). Error bars plot 95% confidence intervals for the proportions.

Figure 2 The proportion of respondents who chose the ear that was likely to maximize benefit from the implant alone (‘unilateral’ choice) based an actuarial model of outcomes in profoundly deaf UK candidates (CitationUKCISG 2004). Proportions are shown separately for the four unaided scenarios (open symbols) and the four aided scenarios (shaded symbols). Error bars plot 95% confidence intervals for the proportions.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.