![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Abstract
One potential explanation for the persistent gap between international state-builders' aspirations and achievements is their misguided understanding of states as institutional apparatuses abstracted and separated from society. State-society interpenetration is actually the historical norm, and a proper understanding of state forms requires close analysis of the conflicts between different social forces as they promote state projects that will advance particular interests over others. International state-builders are best conceptualised as merely one—albeit important—party to this ongoing struggle, which state-builders have no realistic hope of taming. The argument is illustrated by the case of East Timor. Both Indonesian and UN efforts to transplant state projects into Timorese society, even when backed by tremendous economic and coercive resources, failed to simply penetrate and dominate, or to create a technically efficient state insulated from, society. Rather, their state projects became interpenetrated with the society they sought to govern, and thus became shot through with social conflict. Neither more ‘capacity-building’ nor ‘participatory intervention’ can eliminate this conflict, nor evacuate it from the state.
Acknowledgements
I am extremely grateful to Peter Haldén, Philip Cunliffe, Toby Dodge, two anonymous reviewers and especially to Shahar Hameiri for very helpful comments on earlier drafts.
Notes
Lee Jones (DPhil, Oxford) is Lecturer in International Relations at Queen Mary, University of London. His work focuses on the politics of sovereignty and intervention in developing countries. He is currently completing a book on (non)intervention by ASEAN states, and will soon embark on a new project on economic sanctions.
1. See, for example, CitationRotberg, ‘Failure and Collapse’, 31–42; CitationGhani and Lockhart, Fixing Failed States.
2. CitationHameiri, ‘Failed States’.
3. See, for example, CitationTilly, Coercion; CitationMann, Sources of Social Power; CitationSpruyt, Sovereign State.
4. Hameiri, ‘Failed States’.
5. See, for example, CitationUSAID, Fragile States Strategy; CitationDfID, Eliminating World Poverty.
6. CitationRosser, ‘Rebuilding Governance’, 169.
7. Hameiri, ‘Failed States’, 131.
8. CitationMigdal, Strong Societies. Migdal has subsequently adopted a very critical stance on neo-Weberianism. See CitationMigdal, State in Society.
9. CitationZartman, Collapsed States; CitationChesterman et al., ‘Introduction’.
10. See, for example, CitationFukuyama, State-Building; Rotberg, ‘Failure and Collapse’.
11. CitationJayasuriya, ‘Beyond Institutionalism Fetishism’, 383.
12. Migdal, State in Society; CitationJessop, State Power.
13. CitationHarvey, Brief History; CitationHameiri, ‘Capacity and Its Fallacies’.
14. See, for example, CitationCarter, Inventing Vietnam.
15. Rosser, ‘Rebuilding Governance’, 172.
16. CitationVeltmeyer et al., Neo-liberalism; CitationDixon and Kilgour, ‘Vietnamese Transitional Economy’; Hameiri, ‘Capacity and Its Fallacies’.
17. See, for example, CitationRobison and Hadiz, Reorganising Power.
18. CitationBickerton, ‘State-building’; CitationChandler, Empire in Denial.
19. CitationAntlöv, ‘Demokrasi Pancasila’.
20. CitationINFID, 2007. Profile of Indonesia's Foreign Debt. Available at: http://www.jubileeaustralia.org/LiteratureRetrieve.aspx?ID=22291 [Accessed 9 September 2009].
21. Capizzi, Elaine, Helen Hill, and David Macey, 1976. ‘FRETILIN and the Struggle for Independence in East Timor’. Race and Class 17(4), 381–395. Hoadley, J. Stephen, 1976. ‘East Timor: Civil War – Causes and Consequences’. In Southeast Asian Affairs 1976. ISEAS, Singapore, 411–419. Jolliffe, Jill, 1978. East Timor: Nationalism and Colonialism. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia. Dunn, James, 1983. Timor: A People Betrayed. Jacaranda Press, Adelaide. Evans, Grant, 1975. ‘Portuguese Timor’. New Left Review I/91, 67–79.
22. CitationAnderson, ‘East Timor and Indonesia’, 138–141.
23. CitationBudiardjo and Liong, War against East Timor, 96–97.
24. CitationAditjondro, In the Shadow of Mount Ramelau, 10.
25. Kohen and Taylor, Act of Genocide: Indonesia's Invasion of East Timor. Tapol, London, 88–89; Budiardjo and Liong, War against East Timor, 76ff.
26. CitationCarey, ‘Forging of a Nation’, 13.
27. Budiardjo and Liong, War against East Timor, 111; CitationGunn, East Timor, 13ff.
28. Retbøll, Torben, ed. 1980. East Timor, Indonesia and the Western Democracies: A collection of Documents. IWGIA, Copenhagen. Documents, 50; Aditjondro, In the Shadow of Mount Ramelau, 57–58; CitationSaldanha, East Timor, 105–128.
29. Aditjondro, In the Shadow of Mount Ramelau, 57; CitationPedersen and Arneberg, Social and Economic Conditions, 38.
30. CitationOspina and Hohe, ‘Traditional Power Structures’, 52–60.
31. Pedersen and Arneberg, Social and Economic Conditions, 116.
32. Ospina and Hohe, ‘Traditional Power Structures’, 61.
33. Timorese personnel were responsible for a third of conflict-related deaths, over a third of torture and forty per cent of cases of ill-treatment, while 29 per cent of ‘unlawful killings’ were carried out by the resistance. Timorese militiamen also perpetrated most of the violence preceding and following the 1999 popular consultation. CitationCAVR, Chega!, 44, 59–60, 63, 84, 103. This clearly indicates a state reflecting a society divided against itself.
34. Saldanha, Political Economy, 112–128.
35. Ospina and Hohe, ‘Traditional Power Structures’, 52–60.
36. CitationMcWilliam, ‘Customary Governance’, 132–133.
37. Saldanha, Political Economy, 217; Soesastro, Hadi, 1989. ‘East Timor: Question of Economic Viability'. In Unity in Diversity: Regional Economic Development in Indonesia since 1970, ed. H. Hill. Oxford University Press, Singapore, 207–229. Mubyarto, Loekman Soestrisno, Hudiyanto, Edhie Djatmiko, Ita Setiawati, and Agnes Mawarni, 1991. East Timor: The Impact of Integration – An Indonesian Socio-Anthropological Study. Trans. Indonesia Resources Information Programme. Indonesia Resources Information Programme, Northcote.
38. Gunn, East Timor, 22.
39. CitationSingh, Myths and Realities, 247–248.
40. Saldanha, Political Economy, 146–147; Singh, Myths and Realities, 145–151, 335; Pinto, Constâncio, and Matthew Jardine, 1997. East Timor's Unfinished Struggle: Inside the Timorese Resistance. South End Press, Boston. Carey, Peter, 2005. ‘Third World Colonialism, the Geraçao Foun and the Birth of a New Nation: Indonesia Through East Timorese Eyes, 1975–99’. Journal of Romance Studies 5(1), 37–51. Robinson, Geoffrey, 2001. ‘Indonesia: On a New Course?’. In Coercion and Governance: The Declining Political Role of the Military in Asia, ed. M. Alagappa. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 225–256.
41. Taylor, Indonesia's Forgotten War, 126–127; Inbaraj, East Timor, ch. 5; Singh, Myths and Realities, 179; George Aditjondro, ‘ABRI, Inc.’. Sydney Morning Herald, 8 May 1999; Robinson, ‘New Course’, 238.
42. CitationAditjondro, ‘From Colony to Global Prize’.
43. Pedersen and Arneberg, Social and Economic Conditions, 119–121.
44. CitationViera De Mello, ‘Remarks’.
45. CitationBeauvais, ‘Benevolent Despotism’; CitationChopra, ‘Building State Failure’.
46. CitationAnderson, ‘Self-Determination’.
47. CitationShoesmith, ‘Timor-Leste’, 235–241; CitationICG, ‘Resolving Timor-Leste's Crisis’, 3.
48. Ospina and Hohe, ‘Traditional Power Structures’, 65–66, 70, 93, 120.
49. CitationHarrington, ‘Ethnicity, Violence, and Land’.
50. Beauvais, ‘Benevolent Despotism’, 1125; CitationLa'o Hamutuk, ‘How Much Money’.
51. Beauvais, ‘Benevolent Despotism’, 1125.
52. Aditjondro, ‘From Colony to Global Prize’.
53. Harrington, ‘Ethnicity, Violence, and Land’.
54. CitationScambary, ‘Anatomy of a Conflict’, 267.
55. CitationAditjondro, ‘Mapping the Political Terrain’.
56. CitationHohe, ‘Clash of Paradigms’, 579–582.
57. CitationChopra, ‘UN's Kingdom’, 31–33.
58. CitationHood, ‘Missed Opportunities’, 148.
59. CitationMatsuno, ‘UN Transitional Administration’, 66.
60. CitationMatsuno, ‘UN Transitional Administration’, 66
61. Hohe, ‘Clash of Paradigms’, 580.
62. This is often criticised as an anachronistic move by individuals in FRETILIN who had spent decades exiled in Lusophone ex-colonies. However, 80 of the 88 assembly members backed the policy, and none opposed it, indicating a wide degree of elite consensus. Aside from the practical benefits of integration into an international Lusophone community, and an ideological desire to reject Indonesian as the basis of an independent ‘nation-building project’, this can perhaps also be understood as an attempt by a Portuguese-educated generation of elites to ensure their privileged access to the state.
63. Hohe, ‘Clash of Paradigms’, 580.
64. Rosser, ‘Rebuilding Governance’, 178.
65. CitationHughes, Dependent Communities.
66. Anderson, ‘Self-Determination’, 7.
67. CitationBurton, ‘Security Sector Reform’, 104; CitationFox, ‘Repaying the Debt’, 124.
68. CitationSahin, ‘Building the State’, 265; CitationOHCHR, Report, 19.
69. Hood, ‘Missed Opportunities’.
70. Sahin, ‘Building the State’, 265.
71. OHCHR, Report, 57–60; see also CitationGoldsmith and Dinnen, ‘Transnational Police Building’, 1097–1104.
72. OHCHR, Report, 53.
73. Aditjondro, In the Shadow of Mount Ramelau, 26–27.
74. Harrington, ‘Ethnicity, Violence, and Land’.
75. ICG, ‘Resolving Timor-Leste's Crisis’, 6–7.
76. Anti-FRETILIN parties have been supported by US ‘democracy-promotion’ institutions. See Ben Moxham, ‘Taming the “Banana Republic”: The United States in East Timor’. Zed Magazine, January 2005.
77. Scambary, ‘Anatomy of a Conflict’, 272–273.
78. OHCHR, Report.
79. Harrington, ‘Ethnicity, Violence, and Land’.
80. Scambary, ‘Anatomy of a Conflict’, 279–280.
81. Shoesmith, ‘Timor-Leste’; Simonsen, Sven Gunnar, 2006. ‘The Authoritarian Temptation in East Timor: Nationbuilding and the Need for Inclusive Governance’. Asian Survey 46(4), 575–596.
82. Chopra, ‘UN's Kingdom’; Chopra, ‘Building State Failure’; Beauvais, ‘Benevolent Despotism’; Hood, ‘Missed Opportunities’.
83. See, for example, ICG, ‘Resolving Timor-Leste's Crisis’; OHCHR, Report; Hood, ‘Missed Opportunities’.
84. CitationKingsbury, ‘East Timor's Political Crisis’, 8.
85. CitationWilson, ‘Smoke and Mirrors’.
86. Chopra, ‘Building State Failure’; CitationChopra and Hohe, ‘Participatory Intervention’.
87. Chopra and Hohe, ‘Participatory Intervention’, 292–303. See also CitationMearns, Democratic Governance.
88. See, for example, CitationKilcullen, Accidental Guerrilla.
89. Chopra and Hohe, ‘Participatory Intervention’, 298, 289.
90. Chopra and Hohe, ‘Participatory Intervention’, 298–302. In this sense the scheme is only interested in ‘participation’ to the extent that it allows external interveners to impose their goals more successfully on the target society.
91. CitationHobsbawm and Ranger, Invention of Tradition; CitationMamdani, Citizen and Subject.
92. CitationMearns, Looking Both Ways, 31.
93. Hohe, ‘Clash of Paradigms’.
94. Ospina and Hohe, ‘Traditional Power Structures’, 115, 109, 16, 93, 138–142, 153, 117–120.
95. Chopra and Hohe, ‘Participatory Intervention’, 297.
96. CitationHadiz, ‘Decentralization and Democracy’; CitationSedara and Öjendal, ‘Decentralization as a Strategy’.
97. See Rosser, ‘Rebuilding Governance’.
98. CitationJessop, State Theory, esp. 9, 156, 161–167, 199–201, 207–210, 268, 363–364.
99. CitationJessop, State Theory, 41–47, 156–160.
100. Tilly, Coercion.
101. CitationHarvey, Limits to Capital.
102. Gusmão, Xanana, 2007. Speech of HE Prime Minister of Timor Leste, Kay Rala Xanana Gusmao, at the Swearing-In Ceremony of the Members of the Government. Dili, 8 August. Available at: http://www.europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article7561 [Accessed 8 September 2009]. Kingsbury, ‘East Timor's Political Crisis’, 10–11; Scambary, ‘Anatomy of a Conflict’, 278; Steve Holland, ‘East Timor PM Accused of Corruption’. Radio Australia, 26 June 2009.
103. Kingsbury, ‘East Timor's Political Crisis’, 40–41, 47.
104. CitationEley, Forging Democracy.
105. See, for example, CitationRodan et al., Political Economy of Southeast Asia.
106. CitationAyubi, Over-Stating the Arab State.
107. Rosser, ‘Rebuilding Governance’, 172.