Publication Cover
Sex Education
Sexuality, Society and Learning
Volume 21, 2021 - Issue 1
1,722
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Abstinence-only or comprehensive sex education at Myanmar schools: preferences and knowledge among students, teachers, parents and policy makers

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 75-90 | Received 19 Oct 2019, Accepted 26 Mar 2020, Published online: 09 Apr 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Sexuality education in school is important for students’ reproductive health; however, devising ways of tailoring it to the needs of a particular society can be challenging. We compared preferences for type of sexuality education in high schools and the level of knowledge of reproductive health among students, parents and teachers in Myanmar. A cross-sectional study was conducted in public high schools in Pyin Oo Lwin. Students, their parents and teachers were asked their preferences for sexuality education and their reproductive health knowledge. Focus group discussions were held to explore their insights on sexuality education for students. We found that 73% of students preferred comprehensive sex education whereas 62% and 56% of parents and teachers preferred an abstinence only approach, respectively. Reproductive health knowledge was low, particularly among students, and particularly with respect to knowledge of sexually transmitted infections. Cultural issues, training and manpower emerged as key themes from the focus groups. Over half of the students said that they were not receiving any form of sex education at school. Reproductive health knowledge was unsatisfactory among all participants reflecting the insufficiency of current sexuality education classes. Training and support for teachers should be provided.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the authors on request.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by a biennial grant from the World Health Organization [Reference SEMMR-1408499] which had no involvement in study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit this paper for publication. The results presented and their interpretation are those of the authors alone.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 226.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.