Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/aee8b4c0-2b09-4087-8607-bbd25da3d6ee/tsta_a_1145532_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. (A) Optical and (B) SEM images for three scaffolds: 3D printed PLA/HA (1), β-TCP (2) and DBM (3).
![Figure 2. (A) Optical and (B) SEM images for three scaffolds: 3D printed PLA/HA (1), β-TCP (2) and DBM (3).](/cms/asset/b43ae961-ebd3-49d0-a9f9-8de7311b8475/tsta_a_1145532_f0002_oc.gif)
Table 1. Scaffold properties.
Figure 3. BMSC responses to three scaffolds. (A) SEM images of the attachment of BMSCs on (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds after culturing for seven days. (B, C) The fluorescence images of proliferation of BMSCs on (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds after culturing for seven days. (← The state of proliferation of BMSCs; ▄ the selected areas in B corresponding to C. Length scales: (A) 50 μm, (B) 10 μm and (C) 8 μm).
![Figure 3. BMSC responses to three scaffolds. (A) SEM images of the attachment of BMSCs on (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds after culturing for seven days. (B, C) The fluorescence images of proliferation of BMSCs on (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds after culturing for seven days. (← The state of proliferation of BMSCs; ▄ the selected areas in B corresponding to C. Length scales: (A) 50 μm, (B) 10 μm and (C) 8 μm).](/cms/asset/115fd7e1-f2e6-4a1c-b17b-0f93e24dd1d7/tsta_a_1145532_f0003_oc.gif)
Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of three scaffolds: (A) cell adhesion rate, (B) cell proliferation, (C) ALP activity, (D) osteogenic gene expression and (E) COL-1 of BMSCs cultured on different scaffolds (*p<0.05).
![Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of three scaffolds: (A) cell adhesion rate, (B) cell proliferation, (C) ALP activity, (D) osteogenic gene expression and (E) COL-1 of BMSCs cultured on different scaffolds (*p<0.05).](/cms/asset/a567d7ae-d432-45d2-aee2-ca3166f7a321/tsta_a_1145532_f0004_oc.gif)
Figure 5. Micro CT images for three scaffolds. (A) Plane and profile images of (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds before implanting. (B) Typical micro-CT images of (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) bone defect without scaffold at four weeks in vivo. (C) Micro-CT images of (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) bone defect without scaffold at eight weeks in vivo.
![Figure 5. Micro CT images for three scaffolds. (A) Plane and profile images of (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds before implanting. (B) Typical micro-CT images of (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) bone defect without scaffold at four weeks in vivo. (C) Micro-CT images of (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) bone defect without scaffold at eight weeks in vivo.](/cms/asset/690cc90f-d241-4f62-8d2e-abab8b50fa29/tsta_a_1145532_f0005_oc.gif)
Table 2. Hematological variables in blood from rats at different times after surgery.
Figure 6. BV/TV and degradation rate in every group (A) Percentage of new bone formation at four and eight weeks. (B) Percentage of degradation of three scaffolds at four and eight weeks. (*p<0.05)
![Figure 6. BV/TV and degradation rate in every group (A) Percentage of new bone formation at four and eight weeks. (B) Percentage of degradation of three scaffolds at four and eight weeks. (*p<0.05)](/cms/asset/0ca30418-09ca-4b3e-b752-44f1d7e99557/tsta_a_1145532_f0006_b.gif)
Figure 7. HE images of implanted and control group after four and eight weeks. (A) Histological images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group four weeks after implantation. (B) Histological images of (1) implanted PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group eight weeks after implantation. Scale bars 10 μm.
![Figure 7. HE images of implanted and control group after four and eight weeks. (A) Histological images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group four weeks after implantation. (B) Histological images of (1) implanted PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group eight weeks after implantation. Scale bars 10 μm.](/cms/asset/8c425854-7dbd-4eb7-add9-9d0b54fcc70c/tsta_a_1145532_f0007_oc.gif)
Figure 8. Immunohistochemical examination of osteocalcin and type I collagen were carried out in the margin of bone defect in different time (magnification ×100). (A) Osteocalcin expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group four weeks after implanting. (B) Osteocalcin expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group eight weeks after implanting. (C) Semi-quantitative scatter plot of osteocalcin expression. (D) Type I collagen expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group four weeks after implanting. (E) Type I collagen expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group eight weeks after implanting. (F) Semi-quantitative scatter plot of type I collagen expression (*p<0.05).
![Figure 8. Immunohistochemical examination of osteocalcin and type I collagen were carried out in the margin of bone defect in different time (magnification ×100). (A) Osteocalcin expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group four weeks after implanting. (B) Osteocalcin expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group eight weeks after implanting. (C) Semi-quantitative scatter plot of osteocalcin expression. (D) Type I collagen expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group four weeks after implanting. (E) Type I collagen expression images of implanted (1) PLA/HA, (2) β-TCP and (3) DBM scaffolds as well as (4) control group eight weeks after implanting. (F) Semi-quantitative scatter plot of type I collagen expression (*p<0.05).](/cms/asset/a459d4b3-54ca-497b-a39a-3d2f1734fedf/tsta_a_1145532_f0008_oc.gif)