3,294
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus on Energy Harvesting - Science, Technology, Application and Metrology

Effect of end group of amorphous perfluoro-polymer electrets on electron trapping

, , , , &
Pages 486-494 | Received 07 Mar 2018, Accepted 13 May 2018, Published online: 12 Jun 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic chemical structure of CYTOP polymers.

Figure 1. Schematic chemical structure of CYTOP polymers.

Figure 2. Infrared absorption spectra of CTL-S, CTL-A and CTL-M.

Figure 2. Infrared absorption spectra of CTL-S, CTL-A and CTL-M.

Figure 3. TSD spectra of CYTOP polymers.

Figure 3. TSD spectra of CYTOP polymers.

Table 1. Surface charge density of negatively charged, 15 μm-thick amorphous fluropolymers [Citation11,12].

Figure 4. (a) Principle of the inverse photoelectron spectroscopy (LEIPS), (b) Schematic of the LEIPS measurement setup.

Figure 4. (a) Principle of the inverse photoelectron spectroscopy (LEIPS), (b) Schematic of the LEIPS measurement setup.

Figure 5. LEIPS results: (a) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-S with 0.15 μA of sample current, (b) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-S with 0.70 μA of sample current, (c) Thickness dependence of LEIPS onset energy for CTL-S, (d) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-A with 0.15 μA of sample current, (e) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-A with 0.70 μA of sample current, (f) Thickness dependence of LEIPS onset energy for CTL-A.

Figure 5. LEIPS results: (a) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-S with 0.15 μA of sample current, (b) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-S with 0.70 μA of sample current, (c) Thickness dependence of LEIPS onset energy for CTL-S, (d) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-A with 0.15 μA of sample current, (e) Intensity of emitted light from CTL-A with 0.70 μA of sample current, (f) Thickness dependence of LEIPS onset energy for CTL-A.

Figure 6. Influence of the external electrostatic field on electron affinity.

Figure 6. Influence of the external electrostatic field on electron affinity.

Figure 7. Ground-state structures of (a) PE, (b) PTFE, (c) PTFE, (d) CTL-S, (e) CTL-A, (f) CTL-M.

Note: Red and blue meshes represents distribution of the trapped electron.
Figure 7. Ground-state structures of (a) PE, (b) PTFE, (c) PTFE, (d) CTL-S, (e) CTL-A, (f) CTL-M.

Figure 8. Strong electron-attracting characteristics of CTL-M end group.

Note: The trapped electron stays near amide bond of CTL-M, even structural conformation is transformed.
Figure 8. Strong electron-attracting characteristics of CTL-M end group.

Figure 9. Calculated orbital energy level of PTFE with different number of carbons.

Figure 9. Calculated orbital energy level of PTFE with different number of carbons.

Figure 10. Visualized distribution of the trapped electron in CYTOP monomers.

Figure 10. Visualized distribution of the trapped electron in CYTOP monomers.

Figure 11. Calculated orbital energy level of polymer electrets.

Note: The bars with arrows represent energy of orbital where the electron is trapped.
Figure 11. Calculated orbital energy level of polymer electrets.

Table 2. TSD peak temperature of polymer electrets.