Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/c2285bb7-9a3b-418f-bf42-89f34af0de24/tsta_a_1527645_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Representative OM and SEM images taken from the horizontal (a)–(c) and vertical (d)–(f) cross-sections of the AF specimen.
![Figure 3. Representative OM and SEM images taken from the horizontal (a)–(c) and vertical (d)–(f) cross-sections of the AF specimen.](/cms/asset/0342b41a-5e96-4477-a877-5b182c7f65f8/tsta_a_1527645_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. EBSD analysis of the vertical cross-sections taken from the as-fabricated specimen: (a) color inverse pole figure (IPF) showing grain orientation distributions and (b) corresponding pole figure (PF), (c) grain size distribution, (d) high-magnification IPF and (e) grain boundary map.
![Figure 4. EBSD analysis of the vertical cross-sections taken from the as-fabricated specimen: (a) color inverse pole figure (IPF) showing grain orientation distributions and (b) corresponding pole figure (PF), (c) grain size distribution, (d) high-magnification IPF and (e) grain boundary map.](/cms/asset/de9f929a-5790-4cd6-a797-d957d0a13fb5/tsta_a_1527645_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. TEM images of AF specimen: (a) BF-TEM image taken from the horizontal cross-section showing cellular structures, (b) zoom-in image of (a) showing high-density dislocations, and (c) BF-TEM image with corresponding SAED taken from the vertical cross-section exhibiting acicular martensites.
![Figure 5. TEM images of AF specimen: (a) BF-TEM image taken from the horizontal cross-section showing cellular structures, (b) zoom-in image of (a) showing high-density dislocations, and (c) BF-TEM image with corresponding SAED taken from the vertical cross-section exhibiting acicular martensites.](/cms/asset/5d06a51e-18ae-480d-bee2-1c39b3e6e0de/tsta_a_1527645_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. TEM analysis of precipitate characteristics in age-treated specimen: (a) BF-TEM overview showing massive nanoprecipitates embedded in amorphous matrix, (b) zoom-in BF-TEM image of (a) showing precipitate morphology, (c) zoom-in image taken from the given region of (b), (d) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image showing the coherent interface with elastic strain; and (e) HRTEM image showing the complete coherent interface.
![Figure 6. TEM analysis of precipitate characteristics in age-treated specimen: (a) BF-TEM overview showing massive nanoprecipitates embedded in amorphous matrix, (b) zoom-in BF-TEM image of (a) showing precipitate morphology, (c) zoom-in image taken from the given region of (b), (d) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image showing the coherent interface with elastic strain; and (e) HRTEM image showing the complete coherent interface.](/cms/asset/93124c70-a6d7-49ef-b05a-20ce5b9ff52c/tsta_a_1527645_f0006_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Comparison of the mechanical properties for grade 300 MS fabricated by SLM and conventional wrought method.
Figure 8. Impact energies (a) and fracture morphologies (b) of as-fabricated and heat-treated MS specimens with horizontal and vertical building directions.
![Figure 8. Impact energies (a) and fracture morphologies (b) of as-fabricated and heat-treated MS specimens with horizontal and vertical building directions.](/cms/asset/43e8ce68-0734-493c-90ee-3aa57d806554/tsta_a_1527645_f0008_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Tribological properties of SLM fabricated MS specimens.
Figure 9. Friction coefficient (a), 3D wear track morphology (b), and sectional line profiles of wear track of SLM specimens.
![Figure 9. Friction coefficient (a), 3D wear track morphology (b), and sectional line profiles of wear track of SLM specimens.](/cms/asset/8349ca62-4edb-4ad8-97dd-cfab54eed5b8/tsta_a_1527645_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 11. Potentiodynamic polarization curves and summarized relative corrosion properties of as-fabricated and heat-treated MS specimens.
![Figure 11. Potentiodynamic polarization curves and summarized relative corrosion properties of as-fabricated and heat-treated MS specimens.](/cms/asset/4417c8cb-c93d-4a29-bade-46aa144553b4/tsta_a_1527645_f0011_oc.jpg)