7,033
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Land restoration in food security programmes: synergies with climate change mitigation

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1260-1270 | Received 24 May 2017, Accepted 05 Jan 2018, Published online: 26 Jan 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Greenhouse gas fluxes in the business as usual (BAU) and project scenarios aggregated over all the surveyed sites (n = 28), and broken down by source of emissions. Fluxes of all sites have been normalized to a per hectare basis, to facilitate comparison between sites, which vary in size.

Figure 1. Greenhouse gas fluxes in the business as usual (BAU) and project scenarios aggregated over all the surveyed sites (n = 28), and broken down by source of emissions. Fluxes of all sites have been normalized to a per hectare basis, to facilitate comparison between sites, which vary in size.

Figure 2. Summary of carbon benefits aggregated over all study sites (n = 28). Positive carbon benefits indicate a net reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions. Black dots indicate median values, and boxes show interquartile range. Outliers not shown.Note: SOC, soil organic carbon; GHG, greenhouse gas.

Figure 2. Summary of carbon benefits aggregated over all study sites (n = 28). Positive carbon benefits indicate a net reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions. Black dots indicate median values, and boxes show interquartile range. Outliers not shown.Note: SOC, soil organic carbon; GHG, greenhouse gas.

Figure 3. Net greenhouse gas fluxes from study sites, aggregated by land use.Note: BAU, business as usual; GHG, greenhouse gas.

Figure 3. Net greenhouse gas fluxes from study sites, aggregated by land use.Note: BAU, business as usual; GHG, greenhouse gas.
Supplemental material

TCPO_1427537_supplementary_data.zip

Download Zip (439.3 KB)