Figures & data
Figure 1. Greenhouse gas fluxes in the business as usual (BAU) and project scenarios aggregated over all the surveyed sites (n = 28), and broken down by source of emissions. Fluxes of all sites have been normalized to a per hectare basis, to facilitate comparison between sites, which vary in size.
![Figure 1. Greenhouse gas fluxes in the business as usual (BAU) and project scenarios aggregated over all the surveyed sites (n = 28), and broken down by source of emissions. Fluxes of all sites have been normalized to a per hectare basis, to facilitate comparison between sites, which vary in size.](/cms/asset/2906b1bd-0ae7-4329-bdfb-a2a8864e0baa/tcpo_a_1427537_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. Summary of carbon benefits aggregated over all study sites (n = 28). Positive carbon benefits indicate a net reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions. Black dots indicate median values, and boxes show interquartile range. Outliers not shown.Note: SOC, soil organic carbon; GHG, greenhouse gas.
![Figure 2. Summary of carbon benefits aggregated over all study sites (n = 28). Positive carbon benefits indicate a net reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions. Black dots indicate median values, and boxes show interquartile range. Outliers not shown.Note: SOC, soil organic carbon; GHG, greenhouse gas.](/cms/asset/9a9371f8-4c90-4322-b6dc-22b14b0f4c6c/tcpo_a_1427537_f0002_ob.jpg)