2,021
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Climate ambition and respective capabilities: are England’s local emissions targets spatially just?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 989-1003 | Received 14 Jul 2022, Accepted 24 Apr 2023, Published online: 03 May 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Overview of indicators in the ambition and capability composite Indicators (Co-I).

Figure 1. Comparison of emission pathways in each target scenario, assuming constant emissions after the achievement of original net zero targets. ‘CCC BNZP’ refers to the Sixth Carbon Budget ‘Balanced Net Zero Pathway’ (n = 301).

Figure 1. Comparison of emission pathways in each target scenario, assuming constant emissions after the achievement of original net zero targets. ‘CCC BNZP’ refers to the Sixth Carbon Budget ‘Balanced Net Zero Pathway’ (n = 301).

Figure 2. Comparison of emissions reduction pathways aggregated by LA type, and compared against the CCC BNZP scenario (sample: n = 311, in which unitary authorities: n = 54, metropolitan boroughs: n = 36, London boroughs: n = 33, district authorities: n = 178, and CAs: n = 10; indexed to 2019 = 1.0).

Figure 2. Comparison of emissions reduction pathways aggregated by LA type, and compared against the CCC BNZP scenario (sample: n = 311, in which unitary authorities: n = 54, metropolitan boroughs: n = 36, London boroughs: n = 33, district authorities: n = 178, and CAs: n = 10; indexed to 2019 = 1.0).

Figure 3. Comparison of emissions reduction pathways aggregated by region against the CCC BNZP pathway (n = 301; indexed to 2019 = 1.0).

Figure 3. Comparison of emissions reduction pathways aggregated by region against the CCC BNZP pathway (n = 301; indexed to 2019 = 1.0).

Figure 4. Choropleth indicating the difference between capability and ambition scores by LA (n = 301).

Figure 4. Choropleth indicating the difference between capability and ambition scores by LA (n = 301).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (1 MB)