1,661
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Antinoise in U.S. equity markets

&
Pages 2069-2087 | Received 05 Jun 2020, Accepted 23 Apr 2021, Published online: 15 Jun 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. The S&P 500 index and the mean absolute signal correlations.

Notes: sample period: 1996.06–2020.08; The figure shows the relation between the S&P 500 Index and the mean absolute signal correlations between a collection of market-based and fundamental indicators. ρXX is a correlation matrix that contains the cross-correlations between the signals. The mean of the absolute cross-correlations of the signals (the absolute of the elements of ρXX) indicates the strength of the correlations. See Section 3.2 for more detail about the signals (predictors).

Figure 1. The S&P 500 index and the mean absolute signal correlations.Notes: sample period: 1996.06–2020.08; The figure shows the relation between the S&P 500 Index and the mean absolute signal correlations between a collection of market-based and fundamental indicators. ρXX is a correlation matrix that contains the cross-correlations between the signals. The mean of the absolute cross-correlations of the signals (the absolute of the elements of ρXX) indicates the strength of the correlations. See Section 3.2 for more detail about the signals (predictors).

Table 1. Predicted vs. realized returns (main result, out-of-sample).

Figure 2. Historical performance (main result, out-of-sample).

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure 2. Historical performance (main result, out-of-sample).Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Table 2. Performance indicators (main result, out-of-sample).

Figure 3. Monte-Carlo correlations: varying ρXX, normal distribution.

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. Panel A shows the distribution of the empirical predictor correlations ρXX. Panel B shows the distribution of the simulated R2's. Panel C shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the lowest R2. Panel D shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the highest R2.

Figure 3. Monte-Carlo correlations: varying ρXX, normal distribution.Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. Panel A shows the distribution of the empirical predictor correlations ρXX. Panel B shows the distribution of the simulated R2's. Panel C shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the lowest R2. Panel D shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the highest R2.

Figure 4. Monte-Carlo correlations: varying ρXX, bimodal distribution.

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. Panel A shows the distribution of the empirical predictor correlations ρXX. Panel B shows the distribution of the simulated R2's. Panel C shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the lowest R2. Panel D shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the highest R2.

Figure 4. Monte-Carlo correlations: varying ρXX, bimodal distribution.Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. Panel A shows the distribution of the empirical predictor correlations ρXX. Panel B shows the distribution of the simulated R2's. Panel C shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the lowest R2. Panel D shows the distribution of the simulated predictor correlations ρXX that yielded the highest R2.

Table 3. Implied market volatility and signal correlations (ρXX).

Figure A1. Historical performance (Robustness test A, out-of-sample).

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A1. Historical performance (Robustness test A, out-of-sample).Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Table B1. Performance indicators (Robustness test A, out-of-sample).

Figure A2. Historical performance (robustness test B, out-of-sample).

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2016.12; out-of-sample period: 2016.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A2. Historical performance (robustness test B, out-of-sample).Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2016.12; out-of-sample period: 2016.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Table C1. Predicted vs. realized returns (robustness test B, out-of-sample).

Table C2. Performance indicators (robustness test B, out-of-sample).

Figure A3. Historical performance (robustness test C, out-of-sample, monthly).

Notes: monthly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A3. Historical performance (robustness test C, out-of-sample, monthly).Notes: monthly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A4. Performance indicators (robustness test C, out-of-sample, weekly).

Notes: weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This table shows a variety of performance measures for different trading strategies.

Figure A4. Performance indicators (robustness test C, out-of-sample, weekly).Notes: weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This table shows a variety of performance measures for different trading strategies.

Table D1. Predicted vs. realized returns (robustness test C, out-of-sample, monthly.

Table D2. Predicted vs. realized returns (robustness test C, out-of-sample, weekly).

Table D3. Historical performance (robustness test C, out-of-sample, monthly).

Table D4. Performance indicators (robustness test C, out-of-sample, weekly).

Figure A5. Historical performance (robustness test D, out-of-sample).

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A5. Historical performance (robustness test D, out-of-sample).Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A6. Performance indicators (robustness test D, out-of-sample).

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This table shows a variety of performance measures for different trading strategies.

Figure A6. Performance indicators (robustness test D, out-of-sample).Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This table shows a variety of performance measures for different trading strategies.

Table E1. Predicted vs. realized returns (robustness test D, out-of-sample).

Figure A7. Historical performance (robustness test E, out-of-sample).

Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Figure A7. Historical performance (robustness test E, out-of-sample).Notes: bi-weekly forecast horizon and rebalancing; in-sample period: 1995.12–2013.12; out-of-sample period: 2013.12–2020.08; Stock Sample: Russell 1000. This figure compares the performance of the different trading strategies.

Table F1. Predicted vs. realized returns (robustness test E, out-of-sample).

Table F2. Performance indicators (robustness test E, out-of-sample).