1,688
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Short-dated smile under rough volatility: asymptotics and numerics

, &
Pages 463-480 | Received 27 Oct 2020, Accepted 15 Oct 2021, Published online: 07 Dec 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Implied volatility smile approximations for the rBergomi model with parameters θ=1,σ0=0.2,η=1.5,ρ=0.7,H=0.3, for expiry t=0.05,0.2. The Monte Carlo price is computed via the hybrid scheme for rBergomi in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps of length t/500. The rate function is computed using the Ritz method in Section 5.1 with N = 8 Haar basis functions, the coefficient a(x) is computed using the Karhunen–Loeve decomposition with N = 300 Haar basis functions (KL). We also compare with a(x) expanded at 0 (a(x)a(0)).

Figure 1. Implied volatility smile approximations for the rBergomi model with parameters θ=1,σ0=0.2,η=1.5,ρ=−0.7,H=0.3, for expiry t=0.05,0.2. The Monte Carlo price is computed via the hybrid scheme for rBergomi in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps of length t/500. The rate function is computed using the Ritz method in Section 5.1 with N = 8 Haar basis functions, the coefficient a(x) is computed using the Karhunen–Loeve decomposition with N = 300 Haar basis functions (KL). We also compare with a(x) expanded at 0 (a(x)≈a(0)).

Figure 2. Implied volatility smile approximation for the rBergomi model with parameters σ0=0.15,η=1.8,ρ=0.78,H=0.07, for expiry t = 0.05. The Monte Carlo price is computed via the hybrid scheme for rBergomi in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps. The rate function is computed using the Ritz method with N = 9 Fourier basis functions.

Figure 2. Implied volatility smile approximation for the rBergomi model with parameters σ0=0.15,η=1.8,ρ=−0.78,H=0.07, for expiry t = 0.05. The Monte Carlo price is computed via the hybrid scheme for rBergomi in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps. The rate function is computed using the Ritz method with N = 9 Fourier basis functions.

Figure 3. Implied volatility smile approximation for the rBergomi model with parameters θ=0,σ0=0.15,η=1.8,ρ=0.78,H=0.07, for expiry t = 0.01, 0.05, 0.2. The Monte Carlo price is computed via the hybrid scheme for rBergomi in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps of length t/500. The rate function is computed using the Ritz method with N = 9 Fourier basis functions.

Figure 3. Implied volatility smile approximation for the rBergomi model with parameters θ=0,σ0=0.15,η=1.8,ρ=−0.78,H=0.07, for expiry t = 0.01, 0.05, 0.2. The Monte Carlo price is computed via the hybrid scheme for rBergomi in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps of length t/500. The rate function is computed using the Ritz method with N = 9 Fourier basis functions.

Figure 4. Term structure of volatility for the rBergomi model with parameters σ0=0.15,η=1.8,ρ=0.78,H=0.3 (above) and with parameters σ0=0.2557,η=0.2928,ρ=0.7571,H=0.1 (below). We plot ATM implied volatility as expiration time increases. We consider shorter expiries in the case of rougher trajectories (smaller Hurst parameter H; however, in this case we also take a smaller vol-of-vol parameter η). The Monte Carlo prices are computed via the hybrid scheme in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps.

Figure 4. Term structure of volatility for the rBergomi model with parameters σ0=0.15,η=1.8,ρ=−0.78,H=0.3 (above) and with parameters σ0=0.2557,η=0.2928,ρ=−0.7571,H=0.1 (below). We plot ATM implied volatility as expiration time increases. We consider shorter expiries in the case of rougher trajectories (smaller Hurst parameter H; however, in this case we also take a smaller vol-of-vol parameter η). The Monte Carlo prices are computed via the hybrid scheme in Bennedsen et al. (Citation2017) with κ=2, with 109 simulations and 500 time steps.

Figure 5. Moderate deviation with β=0.06 and x = 0.4 (time varying log-strike kt=xt1/2H+β) of implied volatility in rBergomi model with σ0=0.2557,η=0.2928,ρ=0.7571,H=0.1,θ=0. Simulation parameters: 108 simulation paths, 500 time steps. Time interval [0,0.1].

Figure 5. Moderate deviation with β=0.06 and x = 0.4 (time varying log-strike kt=xt1/2−H+β) of implied volatility in rBergomi model with σ0=0.2557,η=0.2928,ρ=−0.7571,H=0.1,θ=0. Simulation parameters: 108 simulation paths, 500 time steps. Time interval [0,0.1].