Exploring the Psychological Type Profile of Rural Anglican Congregations Nurtured in the Catholic Tradition: A Pilot Study in Wales

Figures & data

Table 1. Type distribution for rural Anglican churchgoers nurtured in the Catholic tradition, compared with Anglican churchgoers as reported by Francis et al. (2016).

The sixteen complete types								Dichotomous preferences
ISTJ		ISFJ		INFJ		INTJ		E		n = 28		(37.3%)		I = 0.81
n = 14		n = 14		n = 10		n = 1		I		n = 47		(62.7%)		I = 1.17
(18.7%)		(18.7%)		(13.3%)		(1.3%)
I = 1.03		I = 0.85		I = 4.08***		I = 0.34		S		n = 51		(68.0%)		I = 0.85**
+++++		+++++		+++++		+		N		n = 24		(32.0%)		I = 1.60**
+++++		+++++		+++++
++++		++++		+++				T		n = 28		(37.3%)		I = 0.93
								F		n = 47		(62.7%)		I = 1.04
								J		n = 62		(82.7%)		I = 0.96
								P		n = 13		(17.3%)		I = 1.21
ISTP		ISFP		INFP		INTP
n = 0		n = 4		n = 2		n = 2				Pairs and temperaments
(0.0%)		(5.3%)		(2.7%)		(2.7%)		IJ		n = 39		(52.0%)		I = 1.10
I = 0.00		I = 2.00		I = 1.44		I = 3.26		IP		n =  8		(10.7%)		I = 1.66
		++++		+++		+++		EP		n =  5		(6.7%)		I = 0.85
								EJ		n = 23		(30.7%)		I = 0.80
								ST		n = 22		(29.3%)		I = 0.93
								SF		n = 29		(38.7%)		I = 0.80
								NF		n = 18		(24.0%)		I = 2.04***
ESTP		ESFP		ENFP		ENTP		NT		n =  6		(8.0%)		I = 0.97
n = 0		n = 2		n = 2		n = 1
(0.0%)		(2.7%)		(2.7%)		(1.33%)		SJ		n = 45		(60.0%)		I = 0.83*
I = 0.00		I = 0.76		I = 0.99		I = 1.33		SP		n =  6		(8.0%)		I = 1.01
		+++		+++		+		NP		n =  7		(9.3%)		I = 1.47
								NJ		n = 17		(22.7%)		I = 1.66*
								TJ		n = 25		(33.3%)		I = 0.92
								TP		n =  3		(4.0%)		I = 1.12
								FP		n = 10		(13.3%)		I = 1.24
								FJ		n = 37		(49.3%)		I = 1.00
ESTJ		ESFJ		ENFJ		ENTJ
n = 8		n = 9		n = 4		n = 2		IN		n = 15		(20.0%)		I = 2.04**
(10.7%)		(12.0%)		(5.3%)		(2.7%)		EN		n =  9		(12.0%)		I = 1.18
I = 0.90		I = 0.60		I = 1.35		I = 1.04		IS		n = 32		(42.7%)		I = 0.97
+++++		+++++		+++++		+++		ES		n = 19		(25.3%)		I = 0.70
+++++		+++++
+		++						ET		n = 11		(14.7%)		I = 0.91
								EF		n = 17		(22.7%)		I = 0.75
								IF		n = 30		(40.0%)		I = 1.34
								IT		n = 17		(22.7%)		I = 0.95
Jungian types (E)				Jungian types (I)				Dominant types
	n	%	Index		n	%	Index		n	%	Index
E-TJ	10	13.3	0.93	I-TP	2	2.7	1.4	Dt.T	12	16.0	0.98
E-FJ	13	17.3	0.72	I-FP	6	8.0	1.77	Dt.F	19	25.3	0.89
ES-P	2	2.7	0.64	IS-J	28	37.3	0.93	Dt.S	30	40.0	0.90
EN-P	3	4.0	1.08	IN-J	11	14.7	2.05*	Dt.N	14	18.7	1.72*

Note: N = 75 (NB: + = 1% of N).

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

Francis, L. J., Wright, H., & Robbins, M. (2016). Temperament theory and congregation studies: Different types for different services? Practical Theology, 9(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2016.1149679

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar