Coordinated action, communication, and creativity in basketball in superdiversity

Figures & data

Figure 1. Reception area of the Chapeltown community centre.

Table 1. Hierarchical relationship between scales in basketball.

The event	The overarching action
Phases	Higher level actions: components structuring the event (esp. in training) made up of mid-level actions
Plays	Mid-level actions (set plays, mid-level actions in open play) made up of ‘moves’
Moves	Lower level actions (blocking, passing, shooting) made up of chains of ‘micro-level actions’
Micro moves	Micro-level actions (raising an arm, stepping forward, directing one’s gaze, etc.)

Figure 2. Position of players and coach during Fragment 5.

Figure 3. Team A take positions on court, Team B look on.

Figure 4. Coach models the actions of an attacking player.

Figure 5. Coach models passing the ball.

Figure 6. Coach provides verbal instruction to his players.

Figure 7. Team B joins Team A on court.

Figure 8. Coach stops play and comments.

Figure 9. Coach brings the exercise to an end and comments.

Figure 10. Anti-schematic action.

Figure 11. Tiago and Anderson’s positioning during Fragment 6.