889
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The future of immunotherapy for sarcoma

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1049-1057 | Received 26 Mar 2016, Accepted 06 May 2016, Published online: 27 May 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The use of immunotherapeutic challenges for sarcoma has a long history. Despite the existence of objective responses, immunotherapy has been overshadowed by the results of chemotherapy, especially for osteosarcoma. However, the prognosis for non-responders to chemotherapy is still poor and immunotherapy is now focused on again.

Areas covered: We reviewed the following types of clinical trials of immunotherapy for sarcoma: (i) vaccination with autologous tumor cells, (ii) vaccination with peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens, (iii) adoptive cell transfer using engineered T cells expressing T cell receptor directed at NY-ESO-1 and (iv) immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD1/PDL1.

Expert opinion: The immunogenicity of sarcoma might be lower than that of melanoma. Patients with small lesions who have not received any chemotherapy are good candidates for peptide-based immunotherapy. Combining peptide vaccination and immune checkpoint inhibitors is an attractive option, and long-lived memory T cells are attracting attention. Memory T stem cells defined by CD95+ are long-lived and have the capacity for self-renewal and multidifferentiation. We also identified a novel memory T cell population, young memory T cells defined by CD73+CXCR3+. Regulation of such memory T stem cells will be useful for peptide vaccination and adoptive cell transfer.

Article highlights

  • Vaccination with autologous tumor cells can induce clinical and immunological responses, but the results are not stable.

  • Vaccination with antigenic peptides has some efficacy and elicits detectable T cell responses, but the objective response rate is still low.

  • Adoptive cell transfer of engineered T cells directed to the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1 results in impressive regression of the sarcoma burden.

  • The immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab can enhance the immune responses to peptides vaccines.

  • Combination therapy with peptide vaccination and immune checkpoint inhibitors for sarcoma is very attractive. Our observations suggest that good responders to vaccination are those with small lesions and without previous chemotherapy.

  • Memory stem T cells are attracting more attention with their importance in vaccination and as a source for adoptive cell transfer.

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.

Declaration of interests

This work was supported by grants from JSPS KAKENHI (25462344 and 16H05451 to T. Tsukahara), the Takeda Science Foundation (2015-Kenkyu-Shorei to T. Tsukahara) and the Cell Science Research Foundation (2016-Kenkyu-Zyosei to T. Tsukahara). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 960.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.