2,984
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Working 9 to 5? A cross-national analysis of public sector worker stereotypes

, , , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 2064-2093 | Received 27 Sep 2022, Accepted 28 Aug 2023, Published online: 15 Sep 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Overview of the procedures of the 2-step approach.

Figure 1. Overview of the procedures of the 2-step approach.

Table 1. Sample descriptives of study 1.

Table 2. Master list of thirty-six traits.

Table 3. Sample descriptives of study 2.

Figure 2. Stereotype profile of public sector workers across countries.

Note. The words show the top ten most frequently selected traits as typical of public sector workers. The grey bars in the left panel show the percentage of participants that selected the trait as one of their top five most typical of public sector workers. The right panel shows the mean valence scores for each trait.
Figure 2. Stereotype profile of public sector workers across countries.

Figure 3. Stereotype profiles of public sector workers in the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, and South Korea.

Note. The grey bars in the left panel show the percentage of participants that selected the trait as one of their top five most typical of public sector workers. The right panel shows the mean valence scores for each trait. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean valence scores.
Figure 3. Stereotype profiles of public sector workers in the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, and South Korea.

Table 4. Post-hoc pairwise country comparisons.

Table S1. Stereotypes for public sector workers in all countries combined (n = 3,042).

Table S2. Stereotypes for public sector workers in the United States (n = 610).

Table S3. Stereotypes for public sector workers in Canada (n = 623).

Table S4. Stereotypes for public sector workers in the Netherlands (n = 1,176).

Table S5. Stereotypes for public sector workers in South Korea (n = 633).