3,902
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

OXPHOS-targeting drugs in oncology: new perspectives

, , &
Pages 939-952 | Received 08 May 2023, Accepted 18 Sep 2023, Published online: 28 Sep 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Chemical structures of MTDs.

Figure 1. Chemical structures of MTDs.

Figure 2. Selective uptake of TPP+-based MTDs into tumor mitochondria. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Zielonka J, Joseph J, Sikora A, Hardy M, Ouari O, Vasquez-Vivar J, Cheng G, Lopez M, Kalyanaraman B. Mitochondria-targeted triphenylphosphonium-based compounds: syntheses, mechanisms of action, and therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Chemical reviews. 2017;117(15):10043 –10,120. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.

Figure 2. Selective uptake of TPP+-based MTDs into tumor mitochondria. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from Zielonka J, Joseph J, Sikora A, Hardy M, Ouari O, Vasquez-Vivar J, Cheng G, Lopez M, Kalyanaraman B. Mitochondria-targeted triphenylphosphonium-based compounds: syntheses, mechanisms of action, and therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Chemical reviews. 2017;117(15):10043 –10,120. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.

Table 1. Potency and toxicity of selected mitochondria-targeted drugs in different cancers.

Figure 3. Comparisons of MTDs and the corresponding parent compounds on cell proliferation inhibitions in human pancreatic cancer (MiaPaca-2) cells. The effects of MTDs and their parental compounds on the proliferation of MiaPaCa-2 cells were monitored in the IncuCyte Live-cell Analysis system. The IC50 values were determined at the point at which control cells reached ~ 90% confluence. Relative cell confluence (control is taken as 100%) is plotted against concentration. Dashed lines represent the fitting curves used to determine the IC50 values as indicated. The fold of differences as indicated were calculated by the potency difference of the IC50 values between each mitochondria-targeted drug and its parental compound. The IC50 values of Mito-Met and metformin were published previously in Cancer Research (Cheng G et al., cancer Res, 2016). The IC50 values of Mito-ATO and ATO were published in Scientific Reports (Cheng G et al., Scientific Reports, 2020; Cheng G et al., Scientific Reports, 2022). This figure is re-used under CC by 4.0 from Cheng G, Hardy M, Kalyanaraman B. Antiproliferative effects of mitochondria-targeted N-acetylcysteine and analogs in cancer cells. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:7254.

Figure 3. Comparisons of MTDs and the corresponding parent compounds on cell proliferation inhibitions in human pancreatic cancer (MiaPaca-2) cells. The effects of MTDs and their parental compounds on the proliferation of MiaPaCa-2 cells were monitored in the IncuCyte Live-cell Analysis system. The IC50 values were determined at the point at which control cells reached ~ 90% confluence. Relative cell confluence (control is taken as 100%) is plotted against concentration. Dashed lines represent the fitting curves used to determine the IC50 values as indicated. The fold of differences as indicated were calculated by the potency difference of the IC50 values between each mitochondria-targeted drug and its parental compound. The IC50 values of Mito-Met and metformin were published previously in Cancer Research (Cheng G et al., cancer Res, 2016). The IC50 values of Mito-ATO and ATO were published in Scientific Reports (Cheng G et al., Scientific Reports, 2020; Cheng G et al., Scientific Reports, 2022). This figure is re-used under CC by 4.0 from Cheng G, Hardy M, Kalyanaraman B. Antiproliferative effects of mitochondria-targeted N-acetylcysteine and analogs in cancer cells. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:7254.