2,016
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original research

Economic burden of highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients in the French national health insurance database

, , , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 1135-1144 | Received 29 Apr 2021, Accepted 17 Jun 2021, Published online: 08 Jul 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patients’ characteristics (N = 9,596)

Table 2. Healthcare use (all disease and injuries combined) of highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patients with at least two years of follow-up (N = 8,045)

Table 3. Cost of highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patients with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data (N = 7,956)

Figure 1. Mean annual cost per highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patient with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data (N = 7,956), in all patients and by inclusion criterion, by large category of items

(a): All patients; (b): Criterion 1 (5,464 patients): At least one reimbursement of HE DMT (natalizumab, fingolimod); (c): Criterion 2 (139 patients): At least two relapses in one year and no previous treatment for MS during the previous two years and an MRI of the central nervous system performed during the three months following the second relapse and a DMT during the six months following the MRI; (d): Criterion 3 (2,345 patients): One relapse in one year despite a DMT, with an MRI of the central nervous system performed during the three months following the relapse and a switch of DMT during the six months following the MRI. Of note, the number of patients followed decreases over time; therefore, results should be interpreted with caution, particularly the eighth year (829 patients).
Figure 1. Mean annual cost per highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patient with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data (N = 7,956), in all patients and by inclusion criterion, by large category of items

Figure 2. Mean annual cost per calendar year per highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patient with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data (N = 7,956), in all patients and by inclusion criterion, with 95% confidence intervals

Criterion 1 (5,464 patients): At least one reimbursement of HE DMT (natalizumab, fingolimod); Criterion 2 (139 patients): At least two relapses in one year and no previous treatment for MS during the previous two years and an MRI of the central nervous system performed during the three months following the second relapse and a DMT during the six months following the MRI; Criterion 3 (2,345 patients): One relapse in one year despite a DMT, with an MRI of the central nervous system performed during the three months following the relapse and a switch of DMT during the six months following the MRI.Notes: The mean annual cost in each calendar year is lower than the mean cost for the first year after inclusion (presented in ) because some patients have less than a year of expenditures (i.e. patients included in July only have six months of expenditures). In 2012, there was only one criterion 2 patient; therefore, there is no confidence interval for that year.
Figure 2. Mean annual cost per calendar year per highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patient with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data (N = 7,956), in all patients and by inclusion criterion, with 95% confidence intervals

Figure 3. Mean annual cost per highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patient with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data, in 2010 (N = 1,097) and 2015 (N = 1,258)

Healthcare professionals’ visits: primary and secondary car visits, other medical professional visits, and outpatient departments visits and procedures
Figure 3. Mean annual cost per highly active relapsing-remitting adult incident patient with at least two years of follow-up and usable cost data, in 2010 (N = 1,097) and 2015 (N = 1,258)

Availability of data and material

Data from the National Health data system in France (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS) are publicly available (https://www.snds.gouv.fr/SNDS/Processus-d-acces-aux-donnees) after acceptance from the French data protection authority (Comité National d’informatique et Liberté, CNIL). The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from co-author FR on reasonable request. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.