754
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

An exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel tissue valve compared with mechanical valves for surgical aortic valve replacement in subgroups of people aged 55–64 and 65+ with aortic stenosis in the UK

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1087-1099 | Received 09 Mar 2023, Accepted 14 Aug 2023, Published online: 28 Aug 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Model structure.

*Those entering either Functioning heart valve or Disabling stroke in the partitioned survival model are still at risk of the events listed. People within these states are also attributed to a NYHA class (independent of having a stroke or not). Anticoagulation events only occur in the first 6 weeks in the model. This therefore means that they occur either in the decision tree or the first cycle of the partitioned survival model.
Figure 1. Model structure.

Table 1. Costs used in the model.

Table 2. Utilities used in the model.

Table 3. A summary of the base case results.

Figure 2. Deterministic sensitivity analysis.

*Where the figure refers to a ‘multiplier,’ this indicates a percentage change on the event rates, i.e. a value of 1.2 represents a 20% increase in rates at all time points for the specified event.
**Net monetary benefit (NMB) is a summary statistic that represents the value of an intervention in monetary terms when a willingness to pay a threshold for a unit of benefit (for example, a measure of health outcome or QALY) is known. A value above £0 indicates the treatment tissue valve is cost-effective at the specified cost-effectiveness threshold.
Figure 2. Deterministic sensitivity analysis.

Table 4. Cost breakdown per patient.

Table 5. Scenario analysis- improvement in reoperation rate for novel tissue valve from the base case.

Figure 3. Cost-effectiveness planes.

Figure 3. Cost-effectiveness planes.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (78.9 KB)