Figures & data
Figure 2. The percentage enzyme inhibition of acarbose and its combination with cyanidin-3-galactoside(Cya3Gal) on intestinal α-glucosidase (sucrase). Results were expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 3. * P < 0.01 compared to acarbose alone.
![Figure 2. The percentage enzyme inhibition of acarbose and its combination with cyanidin-3-galactoside(Cya3Gal) on intestinal α-glucosidase (sucrase). Results were expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 3. * P < 0.01 compared to acarbose alone.](/cms/asset/50bf086c-7c93-4c6c-b7ec-8d93116075aa/ienz_a_290860_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. The percentage enzyme inhibition of acarbose and its combination with cyanidin-3-galactoside(Cya3Gal) on intestinal α-glucosidase (maltase). Results were expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 3. * P < 0.01 compared to acarbose alone.
![Figure 3. The percentage enzyme inhibition of acarbose and its combination with cyanidin-3-galactoside(Cya3Gal) on intestinal α-glucosidase (maltase). Results were expressed as mean ± S.E.M., n = 3. * P < 0.01 compared to acarbose alone.](/cms/asset/a05d709e-412f-438e-bf09-c64cc1f55441/ienz_a_290860_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. (A) The data were presented in a Lineweaver–Burk plot, 1/v against l/[S]. (B) Secondary replot of slope vs. [I] from a primary Lineweaver–Burk plot for the determination of Ki. The value of R2 and slope were 0.990 (C) Secondary replot of intercept vs. [I] from a primary Lineweaver–Burk plot for the determination of Ki′. The value of R2 and slope were 0.991.
![Figure 4. (A) The data were presented in a Lineweaver–Burk plot, 1/v against l/[S]. (B) Secondary replot of slope vs. [I] from a primary Lineweaver–Burk plot for the determination of Ki. The value of R2 and slope were 0.990 (C) Secondary replot of intercept vs. [I] from a primary Lineweaver–Burk plot for the determination of Ki′. The value of R2 and slope were 0.991.](/cms/asset/46fe159b-71c0-44e9-93d4-eb893b59b037/ienz_a_290860_f0004_b.gif)