3,010
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Repurposing existing drugs: identification of irreversible IMPDH inhibitors by high-throughput screening

, , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 171-178 | Received 20 Jun 2018, Accepted 22 Oct 2018, Published online: 19 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Screening of CpIMPDH inhibitors. (A) Outline of HTS study. Numbers indicate the number of compounds after elimination by each screening step. (B) The counter assay was performed on 32 compounds to exclude reductase–luciferase inhibitors from specific CpIMPDH inhibitors. Dashed line showed the selection criteria, which eliminated inhibitors that inhibit less than 90% of control CpIMPDH activity in HTS assay, while also inhibit more than 50% of control reductase–luciferase activity, in the inhibitor concentration of 10 μM. ▪: disulfiram, ♦: bronopol, O: ebselen. (C) The structures of the hit compounds.

Figure 1. Screening of CpIMPDH inhibitors. (A) Outline of HTS study. Numbers indicate the number of compounds after elimination by each screening step. (B) The counter assay was performed on 32 compounds to exclude reductase–luciferase inhibitors from specific CpIMPDH inhibitors. Dashed line showed the selection criteria, which eliminated inhibitors that inhibit less than 90% of control CpIMPDH activity in HTS assay, while also inhibit more than 50% of control reductase–luciferase activity, in the inhibitor concentration of 10 μM. ▪: disulfiram, ♦: bronopol, O: ebselen. (C) The structures of the hit compounds.

Figure 2. The inactivation of (A) CpIMPDH and (B) hIMPDH II by disulfiram. The inactivation of (C) CpIMPDH and (D) hIMPDH II by bronopol. Values are mean ± SD from two independent experiments.

Figure 2. The inactivation of (A) CpIMPDH and (B) hIMPDH II by disulfiram. The inactivation of (C) CpIMPDH and (D) hIMPDH II by bronopol. Values are mean ± SD from two independent experiments.

Table 1. kon values of disulfiram, bronopol and ebselen against IMPDHs (M−1·s−1).

Figure 3. The ebselen inhibition of IMPDHs. (A) Ebselen inhibition in respect to NAD+, IMP concentration was kept constant at 250 μM. (B) Ebselen inhibition in respect to IMP, NAD+ concentration was kept constant at 400 μM. Circles show the assay with only vehicle and squares show the assay in the presence of 0.75 μM ebselen. Velocity (v) is in arbitrary units. (C) Ebselen irreversible inhibition to hIMPDH II. Values are mean ± SD from two independent experiments.

Figure 3. The ebselen inhibition of IMPDHs. (A) Ebselen inhibition in respect to NAD+, IMP concentration was kept constant at 250 μM. (B) Ebselen inhibition in respect to IMP, NAD+ concentration was kept constant at 400 μM. Circles show the assay with only vehicle and squares show the assay in the presence of 0.75 μM ebselen. Velocity (v) is in arbitrary units. (C) Ebselen irreversible inhibition to hIMPDH II. Values are mean ± SD from two independent experiments.

Table 2. The inhibition parameters of ebselen against CpIMPDH.

Supplemental material

New-Revised_Supplementary_Material_HTS_of_IMPDH_inhibitors_-_J._Enzy._Inhibit_MU-AS-MU-AS_.docx

Download MS Word (3.8 MB)