Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/56b32866-7f60-4182-92bf-8e19b347e0e4/ienz_a_1742116_uf0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Structure of the lead antioxidant pyrazole derivatives and the designed target compounds 2–6.
![Figure 2. Structure of the lead antioxidant pyrazole derivatives and the designed target compounds 2–6.](/cms/asset/99734b20-bbe2-4e1a-aa62-d11d689471f3/ienz_a_1742116_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1. In vitro antioxidant potential and 15-LOX inhibition activity of compounds (2–6).
Figure 5. Structure activity relationship of the pyrazole derivatives against DPPH radical scavenging assay.
![Figure 5. Structure activity relationship of the pyrazole derivatives against DPPH radical scavenging assay.](/cms/asset/ee5e1244-734f-4b50-9ec9-0e150858e56e/ienz_a_1742116_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Effect of compounds (3a, 4e, 5 b, 5c, 6a, 6c, 6e) and ascorbic acid on the endogenous antioxidant status of rats. GSH: reduced glutathione; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM% control. (n = 6). *, **, and *** p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 compared to control group.
![Figure 6. Effect of compounds (3a, 4e, 5 b, 5c, 6a, 6c, 6e) and ascorbic acid on the endogenous antioxidant status of rats. GSH: reduced glutathione; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM% control. (n = 6). *, **, and *** p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 compared to control group.](/cms/asset/625ab3dc-1d69-41ec-9d11-7c26ddc7fa86/ienz_a_1742116_f0006_c.jpg)
Table 2. In vivo antioxidant potential of compounds.