Figures & data
Figure 4. IC50 and EC100 (μM) of the tested compounds against normal human cells (wi-38) after 72 h incubation.
![Figure 4. IC50 and EC100 (μM) of the tested compounds against normal human cells (wi-38) after 72 h incubation.](/cms/asset/f2673447-ca60-4d3a-bbdf-e4dbda26892f/ienz_a_2304044_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. In vitro anticancer activity, IC50 (μM), of the tested compounds against human cancer cells after 72 h incubation.
![Figure 5. In vitro anticancer activity, IC50 (μM), of the tested compounds against human cancer cells after 72 h incubation.](/cms/asset/2e26e760-c7e0-44f6-878e-fa063661560a/ienz_a_2304044_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Morphological alterations of the most active compounds (0.06 µM)-treated cancer cells lines in comparison with the untreated cancer cells after 72 h incubation.
![Figure 6. Morphological alterations of the most active compounds (0.06 µM)-treated cancer cells lines in comparison with the untreated cancer cells after 72 h incubation.](/cms/asset/063815e9-40e7-431f-a57b-1cf2121054cd/ienz_a_2304044_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. Flowcharts of Annexin-PI analysis of 4c and 4f – treated cancer cell lines in comparison with the untreated cancer cells after 72 h incubation at concentrations equivalent to 0.013, 0.007, 0.005, and 0.006 µM, respectively.
![Figure 7. Flowcharts of Annexin-PI analysis of 4c and 4f – treated cancer cell lines in comparison with the untreated cancer cells after 72 h incubation at concentrations equivalent to 0.013, 0.007, 0.005, and 0.006 µM, respectively.](/cms/asset/d55c1146-950c-4517-9c6f-4ad70137ab6b/ienz_a_2304044_f0007_c.jpg)
Table 1. The total percentage of the apoptotic cell population in the most effective compounds-treated cancer cells lines.
Table 2. Relative fold increase in caspase activity by the most effective compounds relative to untreated HepG2 cancer cells.
Table 3. In vitro PIM-1 kinase inhibition data of the most active compounds.
Figure 8. Lineweaver–Burk double-reciprocal plot for PIM-1 kinase inhibition by 4c and 4f in comparison with quercetin as reference inhibitor in the presence of ATP.
![Figure 8. Lineweaver–Burk double-reciprocal plot for PIM-1 kinase inhibition by 4c and 4f in comparison with quercetin as reference inhibitor in the presence of ATP.](/cms/asset/59adf4af-4f70-49bc-a9a8-5bf4e0ea9131/ienz_a_2304044_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9. Left: Co-crystallised ligand, ligand–enzyme interaction (2D). Right: Overlay of crystallised ligand (magenta) and docked ligand (yellow) with RMSD = 1.431 (3D) inside PIM-1 kinase active site.
![Figure 9. Left: Co-crystallised ligand, ligand–enzyme interaction (2D). Right: Overlay of crystallised ligand (magenta) and docked ligand (yellow) with RMSD = 1.431 (3D) inside PIM-1 kinase active site.](/cms/asset/2a11baad-7706-4338-bfe7-4ab3dc0eb67f/ienz_a_2304044_f0009_c.jpg)
Table 4. Induced fit docking results of the active compounds inside PIM-1 kinase active site.
Table 5. LE and LLE values for the most active anticancer compounds against PIM-1 kinase enzyme.