Rapid force generation during unilateral isometric hamstring assessment: reliability and relationship to maximal force

N.J. Ripleya School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

J. Faheya School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UKView further author information

M. Cuthberta School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK;b The Football Association Group, Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire, UKView further author information

J.J. McMahona School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UKView further author information

P. Comforta School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK;c School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, AustraliaView further author information

Figures & data

Figure 1. Representation of the 90–90 isometric assessment.

Table 1. Between session mean, standard deviation (SD), absolute and relative reliability and absolute and relative (%) measurement error scores.

Download CSV Display Table

Figure 2. (a,b) Scatterplots with linear trend line and 95% CI, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% CI and coefficient of determination (R²) with percentage of explained variance illustrating the relationship between peak force and (a) force at 100 ms, (b) force at 200 ms.

Figure 2. (a,b) Scatterplots with linear trend line and 95% CI, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% CI and coefficient of determination (R2) with percentage of explained variance illustrating the relationship between peak force and (a) force at 100 ms, (b) force at 200 ms.

Figure 3. (a,b) Scatterplots with linear trend line and 95% CI, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% CI and coefficient of determination (R²) with percentage of explained variance illustrating the relationship between peak force and (a) aRFD over 100 ms and (b) aRFD over 200 ms.

Figure 3. (a,b) Scatterplots with linear trend line and 95% CI, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) with 95% CI and coefficient of determination (R2) with percentage of explained variance illustrating the relationship between peak force and (a) aRFD over 100 ms and (b) aRFD over 200 ms.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Rapid force generation during unilateral isometric hamstring assessment: reliability and relationship to maximal force

Table 1. Between session mean, standard deviation (SD), absolute and relative reliability and absolute and relative (%) measurement error scores.

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Rapid force generation during unilateral isometric hamstring assessment: reliability and relationship to maximal force

Figures & data

Table 1. Between session mean, standard deviation (SD), absolute and relative reliability and absolute and relative (%) measurement error scores.

Data availability statement

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date