283
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Random urine uric acid to creatinine and prediction of perinatal asphyxia: a meta-analysis

, , , , &
Pages 3864-3870 | Received 04 Mar 2018, Accepted 29 Apr 2018, Published online: 15 May 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present review is to evaluate whether urine uric acid to creatinine ratio is increased in perinatal asphyxia and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), as well as to assess its predictive accuracy in the disease.

Methods: We used the Medline (1966–2017), Scopus (2004–2017), Clinicaltrials.gov (2008–2017), Embase (1980–2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999–2017), and Google Scholar (2004–2017) databases in our primary search along with the reference lists of electronically retrieved full-text papers. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model was used for the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Results: Fourteen studies were finally included in the present review, that investigated 1226 neonates. Urinary uric acid to creatinine ratio was significantly higher in neonates with perinatal asphyxia than in healthy controls (mean differences (MD): 1.43 95%CI [1.17, 1.69]). Specifically, the mean difference for Sarnat stage 1 was 0.70 (95%CI [0.28, 1.13]), for stage 2 1.41 (95%CI [0.99, 1.84]), and for stage 3 2.71 (95%CI [2.08, 3.35]). The estimated sensitivity for the summary point was 0.90 (95%CI (0.82–0.95)), the specificity was 0.88 (95%CI (0.73–0.95)) and the diagnostic odds ratio was calculated at 63.62 (95%CI (17.08–236.96)).

Conclusions: Urinary uric acid to creatinine ratio is a rapid and an easily detected biomarker that may help physicians identify neonates at risk of developing perinatal asphyxia and HIE. However, large-scale prospective studies are still needed to determine its value in predicting mortality, as well as short- and long-term adverse neurological outcomes.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.