192
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Fetal ST baseline T/QRS rise in normal CTG does not predict neonatal acidemia

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2666-2671 | Received 15 May 2019, Accepted 18 Sep 2019, Published online: 01 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Purpose

Analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform is a relatively new adjunct to support the cardiotocograph in assessing the risk of significant intrapartum fetal acidosis. The use of ST analysis (STAN) combined with cardiotocography (CTG) was reported to significantly lower the incidence of metabolic acidosis. We aimed to assess the role of “baseline T/QRS rise” associated with a normal CTG on the risk of neonatal acidemia.

Study design

This is a prospective cohort study performed at the Division of Perinatal Medicine of Policlinico Abano Terme, Italy. Women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic position beyond 36 weeks of gestation were monitored with STAN and CTG.

Patients and methods

The relationship between “baseline T/QRS rise” and neonatal cord arterial acidemia and hypoxic distress were assessed using a linear mixed-model analysis. Magnitude of “baseline T/QRS rise”, neonatal cord blood acidemia, electrolytes, lactacidemia, and glycemia levels were measured.

Results

“Baseline T/QRS rise” was not associated with neonatal acidemia in the presence of normal CTG, regardless of the magnitude of the T/QRS rise. However, in a linear mixed-model analysis, cord blood sodium levels were negatively (p = .033) associated with T/QRS ratio magnitude.

Conclusions

In the presence of a normal CTG, “baseline T/QRS rise” does not predict neonatal acidemia or biochemical derangement. Greater knowledge of fetal ECG parameters including “baseline T/QRS rise” and their associations with normal, intermediary, and abnormal CTG tracing, is required in assessing the performance of the STAN.

Ethics approval

Institutional Review Board (Policlinico Abano Terme) approval was obtained.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.