![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})
Abstract
In this short paper I reply to Wright's response to my original essay on his Christianity and Critical Realism. Wright makes a number of important points, and these are interesting in so far as they indicate how the same issues can be read in quite different ways. However, this difference ultimately highlights the central issue I explore in the original essay. That is, the capacity for basic dividing lines to occur and persist because of the fundamental nature of the issues at stake.
Notes
1 CitationWright 2016, responding to CitationMorgan 2015.
3 CitationWright 2016, 73.
4 I'm not quite sure why but in Wright's reply he reads my reference to his work as competent philosophy that ought to be widely read as a criticism rather than a compliment. This was intended sincerely, rather than as patronising positioning.
5 CitationWright 2016, 77.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Jamie Morgan
Jamie Morgan is co-editor of Real World Economics Review and former Co-ordinator of the Association for Heterodox Economics.