ABSTRACT
Founded on several highly influential quantitative studies, the past decade has witnessed the OECD and World Bank increasingly converge on the view that cognitive levels of students and education quality, as proxied by international large-scale assessments (ILSAs), are the primary determinant of national economic growth worldwide. More recent OECD and World Bank pronouncements have further suggested these dynamics are clearly illustrated in East Asia’s education and ‘Economic Miracle’, in particular the cases of South Korea and Singapore. Herein we utilise the OECD’s own data to examine this new development narrative, finding little evidence in support of these claims.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
ORCID
Hikaru Komatsu http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-1648
Jeremy Rappleye http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-8253
Notes
* Both authors contributed equally to this piece.
1 It is worth noting here that Taiwan is not listed as a separate country within World Bank data for political reasons. Japan is rarely mentioned these days, perhaps given that it has world-leading levels of ‘human capital’ (e.g., third on the new World Bank Human Development Index) but has been in a prolonged recession and faces a shrinking economy, basically refuting the OECD-World Bank narrative all by itself.