Figures & data
Figure 1. Diagram of the approach to calculate the combined ICER from the base-case results of the two phenotype-specific CEMs.
![Figure 1. Diagram of the approach to calculate the combined ICER from the base-case results of the two phenotype-specific CEMs.](/cms/asset/f0b8f575-cc8e-45f0-92bc-e7ebe990b148/ierk_a_2324027_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Combined deterministic results for the overall ITT population.
Figure 2. Cost-effectiveness plane for empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC alone for the overall ITT population. The graph visually represents the incremental differences in costs and QALYs between treatment groups.
![Figure 2. Cost-effectiveness plane for empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC alone for the overall ITT population. The graph visually represents the incremental differences in costs and QALYs between treatment groups.](/cms/asset/7c19208b-b5ab-4bbb-a097-a2fbc5a25cc2/ierk_a_2324027_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC alone.
![Figure 3. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for empagliflozin + SoC compared to SoC alone.](/cms/asset/553b68b5-4b19-4ad0-b2e9-061be7aa90e0/ierk_a_2324027_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Results (in terms of ICER) of subgroup analyses.