Figures & data
Figure 2. Historical installed capacity by fuel type in Colombia.
Adapted from (UPME Citation2023).
![Figure 2. Historical installed capacity by fuel type in Colombia.Adapted from (UPME Citation2023).](/cms/asset/c69e1f90-4c26-4a3a-b812-d4060db80fb4/gsol_a_2244605_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. LCOE of different types of technology in the period 2020–2022.
Adapted from (NREL Citation2022).
![Figure 3. LCOE of different types of technology in the period 2020–2022.Adapted from (NREL Citation2022).](/cms/asset/c3d368ad-9be1-4f6e-b3bf-f9c511ffee1c/gsol_a_2244605_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. XANT M-24-ETR power curve.
Data adapted from (XANT Citation2017).
![Figure 9. XANT M-24-ETR power curve.Data adapted from (XANT Citation2017).](/cms/asset/5e8cffb5-da97-4be2-a69a-5e626e807f53/gsol_a_2244605_f0009_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Equipment considered in the analysis.
Table 2. Search space during optimisation.
Table 3. Result of cost minimisation for the scenario d = 12%, i = 13.44% and average wind speed 4 m/s.
Table 4. Result of cost minimisation for the scenario d = 12%, i = 13.44% and average wind speed 6.2 m/s.
Table 5. Result of cost minimisation for the scenario d = 12%, i = 13.44% and average wind speed 7.5 m/s.
Figure 10. Result of the cost minimisation for the scenario d = 12%, i = 13.44% (a, b, c), d = 17%, and i = 20.44% (d, e, f), with average wind speed 4 m/s (a, d), 6.2 m/s (b, e), and 7.5 m/s (c, f).
![Figure 10. Result of the cost minimisation for the scenario d = 12%, i = 13.44% (a, b, c), d = 17%, and i = 20.44% (d, e, f), with average wind speed 4 m/s (a, d), 6.2 m/s (b, e), and 7.5 m/s (c, f).](/cms/asset/9ab9d29a-ef14-4a5a-8949-72ff4fd83840/gsol_a_2244605_f0010_oc.jpg)
Table 6. Summary of the costs associated with the recommended system (values in thousands of dollars).