2,994
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Environmental Change and Impacts in the Kangerlussuaq Area, West Greenland

The K-transect in west Greenland: Automatic weather station data (1993–2016)

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Article: S100002 | Received 15 Mar 2017, Accepted 17 Aug 2017, Published online: 20 Apr 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Overview of the GIMEX91 experiment. AWS and SMB stakes were placed along an east–west running transect roughly perpendicular to the ice-sheet edge along the 67 N latitude line. UU/IMAU had a camp close to the ice edge (location 3, tethered balloon), while de FUA camp and boundary layer station, including a 31 m tower, were situated on the ice sheet (location S9). Location S10 was first established as an SMB site in August 1994. Blue represents the current SMB/GPS stations and red the current AWS sites

Figure 1. Overview of the GIMEX91 experiment. AWS and SMB stakes were placed along an east–west running transect roughly perpendicular to the ice-sheet edge along the 67 N latitude line. UU/IMAU had a camp close to the ice edge (location 3, tethered balloon), while de FUA camp and boundary layer station, including a 31 m tower, were situated on the ice sheet (location S9). Location S10 was first established as an SMB site in August 1994. Blue represents the current SMB/GPS stations and red the current AWS sites

Table 1. Climatology at Kangerlussuaq (Kanger) and the AWS locations for the period from August 2003 to August 2016. The wind directional constancy is calculated as the ratio of the magnitudes of the average vector and absolute wind speed

Table 2. List of instruments used at UU/IMAU AWS Type I and Type II. The periods represent mass balance years, September 1 to August 31

Figure 2. Schematic drawings of UU/IMAU Type I (A) and Type II (B) AWS. (C) Type I AWS (1996), Vatnajökull Ice Cap. (D) Type II AWS (Greenland, 2006 location S5). Note that the sonic height ranger is attached to the AWS in (A) and (B), whereas in the ablation area it is mounted on a separate pole drilled into the ice

Figure 2. Schematic drawings of UU/IMAU Type I (A) and Type II (B) AWS. (C) Type I AWS (1996), Vatnajökull Ice Cap. (D) Type II AWS (Greenland, 2006 location S5). Note that the sonic height ranger is attached to the AWS in (A) and (B), whereas in the ablation area it is mounted on a separate pole drilled into the ice

Table 3. Overview of available data in percentages per AWS for three different periods

Figure 3. Overview of the available AWS data along the K-transect for the period from August 1993 to August 2016. For every year, all days of the year (DOY) with available data are plotted as colored vertical bars for every AWS. The grey part in 2016 at S10 indicates that for this period PROMICE AWS data are used. Purple horizontal bars indicate what type of AWS was used: 1 AWS Type I, 2 AWS Type II, and during periods (A) and (B) only a surface height ranger was present at locations S5 and S6, respectively

Figure 3. Overview of the available AWS data along the K-transect for the period from August 1993 to August 2016. For every year, all days of the year (DOY) with available data are plotted as colored vertical bars for every AWS. The grey part in 2016 at S10 indicates that for this period PROMICE AWS data are used. Purple horizontal bars indicate what type of AWS was used: 1 AWS Type I, 2 AWS Type II, and during periods (A) and (B) only a surface height ranger was present at locations S5 and S6, respectively

Figure 4. Mean JJA values for (A) air temperature, (B) shortwave incoming radiation, (C) albedo, and (D) longwave incoming radiation for AWS S5, S6, S9, and S10. Subplot (A) includes air-temperature data from the DMI meteorological station at Kangerlussuaq airport

Figure 4. Mean JJA values for (A) air temperature, (B) shortwave incoming radiation, (C) albedo, and (D) longwave incoming radiation for AWS S5, S6, S9, and S10. Subplot (A) includes air-temperature data from the DMI meteorological station at Kangerlussuaq airport

Figure 5. (A) NAO index anomalies relative to the 1981–2010 baseline and averaged each year for summer months (JJA). (B) Normalized values of the mean November–February precipitation and temperature at Kangerlussuaq, the NAO index, and the temperature at S9

Figure 5. (A) NAO index anomalies relative to the 1981–2010 baseline and averaged each year for summer months (JJA). (B) Normalized values of the mean November–February precipitation and temperature at Kangerlussuaq, the NAO index, and the temperature at S9

Figure 6. (A) Normalized yearly snow accumulation at S9, winter precipitation at Kangerlussuaq airport, and mean JJA albedo at S9; (B) cumulative SMB (m w.e.) at S9; (C) JJA mean net SW radiation at S5, S6, S9, and S10; (D) Equilibrium Line Latitude (ELA), defined as the altitude where SMB = 0, as estimated from inter/extrapolation of annual SMB profiles (van de Wal et al. Citation2012)

Figure 6. (A) Normalized yearly snow accumulation at S9, winter precipitation at Kangerlussuaq airport, and mean JJA albedo at S9; (B) cumulative SMB (m w.e.) at S9; (C) JJA mean net SW radiation at S5, S6, S9, and S10; (D) Equilibrium Line Latitude (ELA), defined as the altitude where SMB = 0, as estimated from inter/extrapolation of annual SMB profiles (van de Wal et al. Citation2012)
Supplemental material

Supplementary Materials

Download Zip (15.7 KB)