1,589
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Environmental Change and Impacts in the Kangerlussuaq Area, West Greenland

Heterogeneous changes in the surface area of lakes in the Kangerlussuaq area of southwestern Greenland between 1995 and 2017

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: S100027 | Received 05 Apr 2017, Accepted 01 Apr 2018, Published online: 13 Aug 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map of the three study areas (marked as 1, 2, and 3) located in southwestern Greenland in relation to the Greenland Ice Sheet, the coast near Sisimiut, and the climatic gradient (maritime at the coast and continental inland), which is present in this region

Figure 1. Map of the three study areas (marked as 1, 2, and 3) located in southwestern Greenland in relation to the Greenland Ice Sheet, the coast near Sisimiut, and the climatic gradient (maritime at the coast and continental inland), which is present in this region

Table 1. Technical details of the imagery used, including date obtained, satellite, spatial resolution and image code. Also listed are the sensor types including Thematic Mapper (TM), Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM), Operational Land Imager (OLI), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER)

Table 2. Table displaying the change in the surface area of lakes (>40 ha) from the study region by area (1, 2, and 3) in 1995, 2002, 2015, 2016, and 2017, and the net surface-area change (km2, m2, and %) between 1995 and 2017

Figure 2. Map showing the lakes that have not changed in surface area (yellow), have increased in surface area (green), and have decreased in surface area (red) in area 1 between 1995 and 2017. The black square highlights the four closed-basin lakes that increased in lake surface area

Figure 2. Map showing the lakes that have not changed in surface area (yellow), have increased in surface area (green), and have decreased in surface area (red) in area 1 between 1995 and 2017. The black square highlights the four closed-basin lakes that increased in lake surface area

Figure 3. Map showing the lakes that have not changed in surface area (yellow), have increased in surface area (green), and have decreased in surface area (red) in area 2 between 1995 and 2017

Figure 3. Map showing the lakes that have not changed in surface area (yellow), have increased in surface area (green), and have decreased in surface area (red) in area 2 between 1995 and 2017

Figure 4. Map showing the lakes that have not changed in surface area (yellow), have increased in surface area (green), and have decreased in surface area (red) in area 3 between 1995 and 2017

Figure 4. Map showing the lakes that have not changed in surface area (yellow), have increased in surface area (green), and have decreased in surface area (red) in area 3 between 1995 and 2017

Figure 5. Net changes in lake surface area in m2 for areas 1, 2, 3, and the entire region between 1995 and 2017 (total)

Figure 5. Net changes in lake surface area in m2 for areas 1, 2, 3, and the entire region between 1995 and 2017 (total)

Figure 6. Number of lakes that demonstrated an increase (black), decrease (grey), and no change (white) in lake surface area between 1995 and 2017 for areas 1, 2, and 3. Also displayed above each bar are the change as a percent of the total area and change in m2

Figure 6. Number of lakes that demonstrated an increase (black), decrease (grey), and no change (white) in lake surface area between 1995 and 2017 for areas 1, 2, and 3. Also displayed above each bar are the change as a percent of the total area and change in m2

Figure 7. The direction of change in lake surface area in m2 and percent for each area (1, 2, and 3) for 1995–2002 (95–02), 2002–2015 (02–15), 1995–2015 (95–15), 2015–2016 (15–16), 2016–2017 (16–17), and 1995–2017 (95–17). Black represents net change, dark grey represents the decrease, and light grey represents the increase

Figure 7. The direction of change in lake surface area in m2 and percent for each area (1, 2, and 3) for 1995–2002 (95–02), 2002–2015 (02–15), 1995–2015 (95–15), 2015–2016 (15–16), 2016–2017 (16–17), and 1995–2017 (95–17). Black represents net change, dark grey represents the decrease, and light grey represents the increase

Figure 8. The net change in lake surface area of lakes in area 1 (black circle), area 2 (grey circle), and area 1 (white circle) by lake location (longitude) in the regional study area between 1995 and 2017

Figure 8. The net change in lake surface area of lakes in area 1 (black circle), area 2 (grey circle), and area 1 (white circle) by lake location (longitude) in the regional study area between 1995 and 2017

Figure 9. The mean summer (June, July, and August) temperature (T°C) and precipitation (mm) for Kangerlussuaq from 1994 to 2016. Also presented are the net changes in surface area (m2) for the three areas used in the study (area 1 as black, area 2 as grey, and area 3 as white bars) for the time periods 1995–2002 (95–02), 2002−2015 (02–15), 2015–2016 (15–16), 2016–2017 (16–17), and 1995–2017 (95–17). Temperature and precipitation data are taken from Cappelen (Citation2017)

Figure 9. The mean summer (June, July, and August) temperature (T°C) and precipitation (mm) for Kangerlussuaq from 1994 to 2016. Also presented are the net changes in surface area (m2) for the three areas used in the study (area 1 as black, area 2 as grey, and area 3 as white bars) for the time periods 1995–2002 (95–02), 2002−2015 (02–15), 2015–2016 (15–16), 2016–2017 (16–17), and 1995–2017 (95–17). Temperature and precipitation data are taken from Cappelen (Citation2017)

Figure 10. Net change in lake surface area (m2) plotted against lake surface area (m2) for area 1 (black circle), area 2 (grey circle), and area 3 (white circle) for the study region

Figure 10. Net change in lake surface area (m2) plotted against lake surface area (m2) for area 1 (black circle), area 2 (grey circle), and area 3 (white circle) for the study region

Figure 11. The net change in lake surface area (m2) plotted against lake:catchment area ratio for area 1 (black circle), area 2 (grey square), and area 3 (triangle) for the time periods 1995–2002, 2002–2015, 2015–2016, 2016–2017, and 1995–2017

Figure 11. The net change in lake surface area (m2) plotted against lake:catchment area ratio for area 1 (black circle), area 2 (grey square), and area 3 (triangle) for the time periods 1995–2002, 2002–2015, 2015–2016, 2016–2017, and 1995–2017