Figures & data
Figure 1. Mountain areas classified into four regions. Black arrows represent dominant storm tracks from Arctic and Pacific Oceans.
![Figure 1. Mountain areas classified into four regions. Black arrows represent dominant storm tracks from Arctic and Pacific Oceans.](/cms/asset/0477a90f-05c2-463c-9655-30c4aca8417f/uaar_a_1650542_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Selection of long-term maximum NDVI. (a) For each 2002–2017 growing season, the maximum NDVI was selected for each 250-m pixel. In this example, an NDVI value of 0.78 (white circle) was selected from early July. (b) Aggregation of 250-m maximum NDVI values to 1-km NDVI value. (c) Selection of long-term maximum NDVI from 2002–2017 1-km maximum NDVI time series.
![Figure 2. Selection of long-term maximum NDVI. (a) For each 2002–2017 growing season, the maximum NDVI was selected for each 250-m pixel. In this example, an NDVI value of 0.78 (white circle) was selected from early July. (b) Aggregation of 250-m maximum NDVI values to 1-km NDVI value. (c) Selection of long-term maximum NDVI from 2002–2017 1-km maximum NDVI time series.](/cms/asset/0b519d5d-a6bb-4b01-b4d5-aa02a634dd6a/uaar_a_1650542_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3(a). One hundred-meter elevation lapse rate with decadal July temperature. The lapse rate per 1,000-m elevation gain was −4.3°C/km for cold Arctic class, −4.2°C/km for Arctic, −4.4°C/km high-precipitation, and −4.5°C/km for interior mountain class. (b) 2002–2017 mean long-term maximum NDVI by elevation zone.
![Figure 3(a). One hundred-meter elevation lapse rate with decadal July temperature. The lapse rate per 1,000-m elevation gain was −4.3°C/km for cold Arctic class, −4.2°C/km for Arctic, −4.4°C/km high-precipitation, and −4.5°C/km for interior mountain class. (b) 2002–2017 mean long-term maximum NDVI by elevation zone.](/cms/asset/39af6711-539b-4c99-9fa0-275ae3594100/uaar_a_1650542_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4(a). Mean long-term (2002–2017) maximum NDVI by precipitation class. (b) Mean long-term (2002–2017) maximum NDVI by temperature class. Each class was computed from at least 100 1-km pixels. Each mountain class had a second-order polynomial trend line with R2 > 0.97, p < 0.01.
![Figure 4(a). Mean long-term (2002–2017) maximum NDVI by precipitation class. (b) Mean long-term (2002–2017) maximum NDVI by temperature class. Each class was computed from at least 100 1-km pixels. Each mountain class had a second-order polynomial trend line with R2 > 0.97, p < 0.01.](/cms/asset/2d146e27-c21b-4166-bb58-4f03a2f63371/uaar_a_1650542_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5(a). Negative relationship between mean long-term (2002–2017) maximum NDVI by precipitation for cooler temperature classes from all mountain pixels. (b) Positive relationship between mean maximum long-term NDVI by precipitation for warmer temperature classes from all mountain pixels. All linear trends were significant (p < 0.01) except for the 12°C trend line.
![Figure 5(a). Negative relationship between mean long-term (2002–2017) maximum NDVI by precipitation for cooler temperature classes from all mountain pixels. (b) Positive relationship between mean maximum long-term NDVI by precipitation for warmer temperature classes from all mountain pixels. All linear trends were significant (p < 0.01) except for the 12°C trend line.](/cms/asset/16bbef87-006e-4a96-a28f-f6612b344708/uaar_a_1650542_f0005_b.gif)
Figure 6. Mean Pearson’s r from 2002–2015 interannual maximum NDVI and July temperature by 100-m elevation zone. Each mean was based on at least thirty 1-km pixels. A Pearson’s r of >0.43 would be required for a significant (one-tailed p < 0.05) correlation with a sample size of 14 years (2002–2015).
![Figure 6. Mean Pearson’s r from 2002–2015 interannual maximum NDVI and July temperature by 100-m elevation zone. Each mean was based on at least thirty 1-km pixels. A Pearson’s r of >0.43 would be required for a significant (one-tailed p < 0.05) correlation with a sample size of 14 years (2002–2015).](/cms/asset/b38edbcf-d891-41af-9c3e-ecac85a41619/uaar_a_1650542_f0006_b.gif)