Figures & data
Figure 1. Geometry of the thin-layer model (not to scale). is the radius of the Earth, and
corresponds to the height of the thin layer. Compared with
and
, the height of Earth’s surface and antenna height are so small that they can be ignored.
denotes the zenith angle at the IPP
![Figure 1. Geometry of the thin-layer model (not to scale). R is the radius of the Earth, and H corresponds to the height of the thin layer. Compared with R and H, the height of Earth’s surface and antenna height are so small that they can be ignored. z′ denotes the zenith angle at the IPP](/cms/asset/9d400a39-af1d-4eda-87a2-605b20afa934/uaar_a_1742062_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. distribution 450 km above Antarctica at 0:00 UTC, 1 January 2012. One TEC unit (TECU) = 1016 electrons/m2
![Figure 2. VTEC distribution 450 km above Antarctica at 0:00 UTC, 1 January 2012. One TEC unit (TECU) = 1016 electrons/m2](/cms/asset/11edb1a7-c652-4e4e-8df9-c5e55cec0240/uaar_a_1742062_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Geomagnetic field intensity distribution in Antarctica on 1 January 2012 450 km above the surface of the Earth, calculated based on IGRF-12. (a) Total intensity and (b)–(d) the field intensity in the x, y, and z, directions, respectively. The unit of geomagnetic field intensity is nano Tesla
![Figure 3. Geomagnetic field intensity distribution in Antarctica on 1 January 2012 450 km above the surface of the Earth, calculated based on IGRF-12. (a) Total intensity and (b)–(d) the field intensity in the x, y, and z, directions, respectively. The unit of geomagnetic field intensity is nano Tesla](/cms/asset/c57c25b3-95a7-4701-a209-e822f8cb9390/uaar_a_1742062_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Antenna of continuously operating GPS system in Zhongshan Base, Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica. The GPS receiver type is LEICA GRX1200PRO, and the antenna type is LEIAT504
![Figure 4. Antenna of continuously operating GPS system in Zhongshan Base, Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica. The GPS receiver type is LEICA GRX1200PRO, and the antenna type is LEIAT504](/cms/asset/aaaa229b-9406-485e-92f9-df418bd30815/uaar_a_1742062_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. (a). Geographic distribution of the continuously operating GPS stations adopted in this study. Note that KUNL (Kunlun Base, China) is a summer station, only providing the data during January. (b). IPP distribution from 00:00 to 12:00 UTC on day 20120101
![Figure 5. (a). Geographic distribution of the continuously operating GPS stations adopted in this study. Note that KUNL (Kunlun Base, China) is a summer station, only providing the data during January. (b). IPP distribution from 00:00 to 12:00 UTC on day 20120101](/cms/asset/6799847a-b9cd-449f-8a24-a787f8ca722a/uaar_a_1742062_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Flowchart of the data processing. TEQC (Translation, Editing, and Quality Check; Estey and Meertens Citation1999) and GPSTk (GPS Toolkit; Harris and Mach Citation2007) were used in the GPS preprocessing, and least squares estimation was undertaken in MATLAB software
![Figure 6. Flowchart of the data processing. TEQC (Translation, Editing, and Quality Check; Estey and Meertens Citation1999) and GPSTk (GPS Toolkit; Harris and Mach Citation2007) were used in the GPS preprocessing, and least squares estimation was undertaken in MATLAB software](/cms/asset/c870811f-95fb-43f4-a78a-6ce8fd5b7cb4/uaar_a_1742062_f0006_b.gif)
Table 1. Mean values of GPS positioning errors in x, y, and z directions for each station derived by the second-order ionospheric term during the whole year for 2012 (mm)
Figure 7. Time series of positioning errors derived by the second-order ionospheric term for twenty-one Antarctic GPS stations in 2012. Components x, y, and z represent the positioning errors in the east, north, and vertical directions, respectively
![Figure 7. Time series of positioning errors derived by the second-order ionospheric term for twenty-one Antarctic GPS stations in 2012. Components x, y, and z represent the positioning errors in the east, north, and vertical directions, respectively](/cms/asset/a65fa458-27a3-4d48-85ab-c6a694b377e6/uaar_a_1742062_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Yearly motion for each GPS station derived by the second-order ionospheric term. The arrows represent the size and direction of horizontal movement, and the depth of the color represents the size of the upward movement
![Figure 8. Yearly motion for each GPS station derived by the second-order ionospheric term. The arrows represent the size and direction of horizontal movement, and the depth of the color represents the size of the upward movement](/cms/asset/ac8ace55-6ac5-4bf0-b67d-ed600ac9a3bb/uaar_a_1742062_f0008_oc.jpg)
Figure 9. Average values over all twenty-one stations for the year 2012. The time interval was set to every 2 hours
![Figure 9. Average VTEC values over all twenty-one stations for the year 2012. The time interval was set to every 2 hours](/cms/asset/9615e0a0-60ba-48ca-b458-07002a8037a3/uaar_a_1742062_f0009_oc.jpg)
Figure 10. Relation of and the positioning error for the first week of 2012. The top panel shows the effect of the second-order ionospheric term on GPS positioning in the x, y, and z directions at ZHON station. The bottom panel shows the average
values over the twenty-one stations
![Figure 10. Relation of VTEC and the positioning error for the first week of 2012. The top panel shows the effect of the second-order ionospheric term on GPS positioning in the x, y, and z directions at ZHON station. The bottom panel shows the average VTEC values over the twenty-one stations](/cms/asset/7937fd8f-b011-471b-8f05-a062e62dfcd1/uaar_a_1742062_f0010_oc.jpg)