307
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Differential Response of Human Nasal and Bronchial Epithelial Cells Upon Exposure to Size-Fractionated Dairy Dust

, , , , &
Pages 583-594 | Received 19 Dec 2014, Accepted 02 Feb 2015, Published online: 12 May 2015
 

Abstract

Exposure to organic dusts is associated with increased respiratory morbidity and mortality in agricultural workers. Organic dusts in dairy farm environments are complex, polydisperse mixtures of toxic and immunogenic compounds. Previous toxicological studies focused primarily on exposures to the respirable size fraction; however, organic dusts in dairy farm environments are known to contain larger particles. Given the size distribution of dusts from dairy farm environments, the nasal and bronchial epithelia represent targets of agricultural dust exposures. In this study, well-differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial cells and human nasal epithelial cells were exposed to two different size fractions (PM10 and PM>10) of dairy parlor dust using a novel aerosol-to-cell exposure system. Levels of proinflammatory transcripts (interleukin [IL]-8, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) were measured 2 h after exposure. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release was also measured as an indicator of cytotoxicity. Cell exposure to dust was measured in each size fraction as a function of mass, endotoxin, and muramic acid levels. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the effects of distinct size fractions of agricultural dust on human airway epithelial cells. Our results suggest that both PM10 and PM>10 size fractions elicit a proinflammatory response in airway epithelial cells and that the entire inhalable size fraction needs to be considered when assessing potential risks from exposure to agricultural dusts. Further, data suggest that human bronchial cells respond differently to these dusts than human nasal cells, and therefore that the two cell types need to be considered separately in airway cell models of agricultural dust toxicity.

Additional information

Funding

The authors thank Robert Devlin and Lisa Dailey at the U.S. EPA for their donation of the NHBE cells used for this work. They also thank Margaret Davidson for her assistance with dust collection and cell culture. This work was supported by the High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety and grant U54OH008085 from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. This work was also supported, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES019325).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 482.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.