Comparison of Different Standard Methods to Evaluate the Total Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Waste Rock

Abstract

The mining industry is a very rapidly increasing production sector in Finland. Many new mines have been opened recently and others are in the planning phase. Mining legislation has been recently revised and compilation of an ID-directive (Industrial Emission Directive, 2010) required to implement environmental law revision is in progress. The aim of this study was to compare different digestion methods recommended by the Finnish Environmental Administration for threshold and guideline value determinations in the Finnish PIMA Decree (214/2007) and Government Decree (591/2006) concerning recovery of certain wastes in earth construction. Altogether six methods were tested, of which five were microwave-assisted acid digestion methods: ISO 11466, EPA Method 3051A (aqua region), EPA Method 3051A (HNO₃), EPA Method 3051A (HNO₃/HCl), and SFS-EN 13656, while one was a fusion method with lithium tetraborate (ASTM C 1391 - 95). The results showed that concentrations of heavy metals (As, Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb, V, and Zn) can be determined reproducibly with standard methods, but the chemical method used can have a significant impact on the results. This conclusion is very important, because the measured heavy metal values can affect the classification and processing of waste materials, and thereby can significantly impact the cost of treatment.

Keywords:

• Leaching
• EPA standard methods
• fusion method
• waste classification
• heavy metals

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the technical staff of Suomen Ympäristöpalvelu Oy for the chemical analyses and Dr. Mikko Räisänen for scientific discussions.