Figures & data
Fig. 1. (a) Profiles of the electron temperature , density
and pressure
profiles; (b) the corresponding gradients with respect to
; and (c) the logarithmic gradient
![Fig. 1. (a) Profiles of the electron temperature Te, density ne, and pressure pe profiles; (b) the corresponding gradients with respect to ρpol; and (c) the logarithmic gradient](/cms/asset/9bbbbdd1-6b20-4d5f-97cf-ce1383adc68e/ufst_a_1820794_f0001_oc.jpg)
Fig. 3. (a) Profiles of the measured and estimated ion temperature , (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient
![Fig. 3. (a) Profiles of the measured and estimated ion temperature Ti, (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient](/cms/asset/77b7d9c4-35d3-4530-953f-e0e35115462e/ufst_a_1820794_f0003_oc.jpg)
Fig. 4. (a) Candidate profiles of the ion temperature , (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient from sampling the conditional distributions
![Fig. 4. (a) Candidate profiles of the ion temperature Ti, (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient from sampling the conditional distributions](/cms/asset/35ed0f47-fb86-45fa-b601-4bb6d2ee39f8/ufst_a_1820794_f0004_oc.jpg)
Fig. 5. (a) Profiles of the measured and estimated angular velocity (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient
![Fig. 5. (a) Profiles of the measured and estimated angular velocity vtor, (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient](/cms/asset/8a0e1237-0f2a-4714-a8d0-afcb749be21b/ufst_a_1820794_f0005_oc.jpg)
Fig. 6. (a) Candidate profiles of the angular velocity (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient from sampling the conditional distributions
![Fig. 6. (a) Candidate profiles of the angular velocity vtor, (b) the corresponding gradient, and (c) the logarithmic gradient from sampling the conditional distributions](/cms/asset/833b771b-ad56-44d2-8a38-909cec82bc45/ufst_a_1820794_f0006_oc.jpg)
Fig. 8. Poloidal view of magnetic equilibria evaluated with magnetic measurements only (blue) and with additional kinetic constraints and current diffusion modeling (red)
![Fig. 8. Poloidal view of magnetic equilibria evaluated with magnetic measurements only (blue) and with additional kinetic constraints and current diffusion modeling (red)](/cms/asset/31328610-dae9-4cf1-86dd-d67790cf48bb/ufst_a_1820794_f0008_oc.jpg)
Fig. 9. Comparison of the radial position of the magnetic axis evaluated with magnetic measurements only (CLISTE mag, blue); magnetic and plasma edge thermal pressure (kinetic) constraints (CLISTE kin, green); and with magnetic, full (thermal and fast-ion) pressure constraints and current diffusion modeling (IDE, red lines with upper and lower 1σ uncertainty band)
![Fig. 9. Comparison of the radial position of the magnetic axis evaluated with magnetic measurements only (CLISTE mag, blue); magnetic and plasma edge thermal pressure (kinetic) constraints (CLISTE kin, green); and with magnetic, full (thermal and fast-ion) pressure constraints and current diffusion modeling (IDE, red lines with upper and lower 1σ uncertainty band)](/cms/asset/a11dffce-6533-48a5-ab56-bbef503d5241/ufst_a_1820794_f0009_oc.jpg)
Fig. 10. Comparison of the plasma energy and internal inductance
evaluated with magnetic measurements only (CLISTE mag, blue); magnetic and plasma edge thermal pressure (kinetic) constraints (CLISTE kin, green); and with magnetic, full (thermal and fast-ion) pressure constraints and current diffusion modeling (IDE, red)
![Fig. 10. Comparison of the plasma energy Wmhd and internal inductance li evaluated with magnetic measurements only (CLISTE mag, blue); magnetic and plasma edge thermal pressure (kinetic) constraints (CLISTE kin, green); and with magnetic, full (thermal and fast-ion) pressure constraints and current diffusion modeling (IDE, red)](/cms/asset/fbe3477c-0a14-43a7-8553-5a55c3fbadb2/ufst_a_1820794_f0010_oc.jpg)
Fig. 11. Current density profile estimated applying constraints from the CDE. The uncertainties are calculated without (blue) and with (red) current constraint included
![Fig. 11. Current density profile estimated applying constraints from the CDE. The uncertainties are calculated without (blue) and with (red) current constraint included](/cms/asset/5a657373-d95f-4249-914a-3e6c5d868455/ufst_a_1820794_f0011_oc.jpg)
Fig. 12. The -profile estimated applying constraints from the CDE. The uncertainties are calculated without (blue) and with (red) current constraint included
![Fig. 12. The q-profile estimated applying constraints from the CDE. The uncertainties are calculated without (blue) and with (red) current constraint included](/cms/asset/1bac7396-9b96-4297-bd59-f4662e53e6b3/ufst_a_1820794_f0012_oc.jpg)
Fig. 13. Separatrix contours and poloidal coordinate system to unwrap the distance of two separatrices
![Fig. 13. Separatrix contours and poloidal coordinate system to unwrap the distance of two separatrices](/cms/asset/b1e83e58-05f9-4be5-a862-d510c533097b/ufst_a_1820794_f0013_b.gif)
Fig. 15. Distance between the separatrices evaluated with either poloidal field coil array 1 or array 2
![Fig. 15. Distance between the separatrices evaluated with either poloidal field coil array 1 or array 2](/cms/asset/42719241-29de-4330-a5ab-87ad3f74ad1c/ufst_a_1820794_f0015_oc.jpg)
Fig. 16. Temporal evolution of the plasma volume comparing two equilibria using poloidal field array 1 or array 2
![Fig. 16. Temporal evolution of the plasma volume comparing two equilibria using poloidal field array 1 or array 2](/cms/asset/9982350f-e079-4a50-aaa0-c15043fe0fdf/ufst_a_1820794_f0016_oc.jpg)