Redefining Interfaith Engagement: A Case Study of One Evangelical Institution

Figures & data

Table 1. Student Participant Demographics.

Pseudonym	Worldview	Political leaning	Gender identity	Sexual orientation	Race/Ethnicity
Ann	Nonreligious	Liberal	Man	Heterosexual	Asian American/Asian
Jamie	Nonreligious	Liberal	Woman	Heterosexual	Mexican American/Chicano
Ruby	Buddhism; Christianity, Protestant	Liberal	Woman	Heterosexual	Mexican American/Chicano
Mia	Christianity, Nondenominational	Liberal	Woman	Heterosexual	Latino/a
Leslie	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Woman	Heterosexual	Latino/a; White/Caucasian
Darbi	Christianity, Protestant	Liberal	Man	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Chace	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Man	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Anne	Christianity, Orthodox	Conservative	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Zac	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Man	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Joe	Christianity, Protestant	Conservative	Man	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Collin	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Man	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Jo	Christianity, Protestant	Conservative	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Regina	Spiritual	Liberal	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Kanye	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Kat	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Wanda	Christianity, Protestant	Moderate	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian
Idris	Christian, Humanist	Moderate	Woman	Heterosexual	White/Caucasian

Note. Students were asked to write in their gender identity.